RE: [Vo]: Aspden Effect
I read about this effect and I don't understand it's relationship to supposed free energy. I've read stuff by Aspden about it and I don't comprehend why he sees this effect as having a bearing on free energy generation. On the other hand, I think he has some good points about ether. If empty space has permittivity and offers radiation resistance, how can it be nothing or not involve some sort of medium? If we keep giving properties to the vacuum, when do we return to it to being ether? If it walks and quacks like a duck, is it a duck? -Original Message- From: Colin Quinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:03 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Aspden Effect Vorts ! I am looking for an article... :) The Aspden Effect was first mentioned in an item that was published in the February 1995 issue of NEN (New Energy News). Vol 2, #10. pages 1, 2,... I have tried to order a back-copy . . . without success. The effect is anomalous angular momentum, some kind of virtual inertia- reported therein by Harold Aspden, and later described here: http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le30/le30.html * ORIGINAL PAPER : http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE8E.html CONTENTS FOR FEBRUARY 1995: Vol. 2, No. 10 DISCOVERY OF VIRTUAL INERTIA 1 THE ASPDEN EFFECT .2 If anyone had a subscription at that time, may I please prevail upon you to obtain a copy? Thanks very much :) Best Regards, Colin Quinney crquin at rogers.com
Re: [Vo]: Aspden Effect
Chris, There are more aether theories out there than one can shake a stick at. Everybody has one, but I want to avoid the theorists (for now). I just wish to see the original description so hopefully I can build exactly that. ( But if I build it, will they come? ;) Colin - Original Message - From: Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:42 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Aspden Effect I read about this effect and I don't understand it's relationship to supposed free energy. I've read stuff by Aspden about it and I don't comprehend why he sees this effect as having a bearing on free energy generation. On the other hand, I think he has some good points about ether. If empty space has permittivity and offers radiation resistance, how can it be nothing or not involve some sort of medium? If we keep giving properties to the vacuum, when do we return to it to being ether? If it walks and quacks like a duck, is it a duck? -Original Message- From: Colin Quinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:03 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Aspden Effect Vorts ! I am looking for an article... :) The Aspden Effect was first mentioned in an item that was published in the February 1995 issue of NEN (New Energy News). Vol 2, #10. pages 1, 2,... I have tried to order a back-copy . . . without success. The effect is anomalous angular momentum, some kind of virtual inertia- reported therein by Harold Aspden, and later described here: http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le30/le30.html * ORIGINAL PAPER : http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE8E.html CONTENTS FOR FEBRUARY 1995: Vol. 2, No. 10 DISCOVERY OF VIRTUAL INERTIA 1 THE ASPDEN EFFECT .2 If anyone had a subscription at that time, may I please prevail upon you to obtain a copy? Thanks very much :) Best Regards, Colin Quinney crquin at rogers.com
Re: [Vo]: Aspden Effect
(The MIBs are at Frank again. :-) On 8/30/06, Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read about this effect and I don't understand it's relationship to supposed free energy. I've read stuff by Aspden about it and I don't comprehend why he sees this effect as having a bearing on free energy generation. On the other hand, I think he has some good points about ether. If empty space has permittivity and offers radiation resistance, how can it be nothing or not involve some sort of medium? If we keep giving properties to the vacuum, when do we return to it to being ether? If it walks and quacks like a duck, is it a duck? Of course it is. When I discovered the Beta-atmosphere/aether held materials together at the atomic level and attractive forces were as insubstantial as vacua in the Alpha-atmosphere I realised immediately that Science needed turning inside out. Read the published papers and associated info in the File and Photo sections of the Yahoo Beta-atmosphere Group. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Beta-atmosphere_group/ If they don't convince you that the aether is real and substantial then I can't imagine anything will - ever the Gamma-atmosphere evidence of Stoern's perpetuum mobile. Frank Grimer
