Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 2/20/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy water reactor??
Surely you jest.
thomas malloy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 2/20/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy
Harry Veeder wrote:
reactor is a plutonium 239 generator, which is how the Canadians and
Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation, I don't
think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Sure. Why else do you think Bush has not invaded
On 2/23/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
reactor is a plutonium 239 generator, which is how the Canadians and
Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation, I don't
think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
reactor is a plutonium 239 generator, which is how the Canadians and
Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation, I don't
think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Sure. Why else do you think
Harry Veeder wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
reactor is a plutonium 239 generator, which is how the Canadians and
Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation, I don't
think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Sure. Why else
Harry Veeder wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Canadians and Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation, I
don't think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Harry
I think that Canada is a nuclear power, maybe not. They did however
build
thomas malloy wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Canadians and Indians built their first bombs. Given the World's situation,
I don't think that anyone is going to stop the Iranian either.
we built the bomb?
Harry
I think that Canada is a nuclear power, maybe
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:25:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps the fact that the president of Iran asserted that their goal is
to erase Israel from the map has something to do with it.
The actual phrase, reported in LeMonde IIRC, was something like rayer
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:08:28 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
As I understood it at the time, he should Israel should be
^^ said
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Competition (capitalism)
Standing Bear wrote:
Remember the Hindenberg? What, not old enough? Well we all saw the
frantic newscast and the fiery pictures often enough if we have even been
marginally educated. Most commentators blamed the Germans for being
'stupid' for building a hydrogen derigible or at least
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:25:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps the fact that the president of Iran asserted that their goal is
to erase Israel from the map has something to do with it.
The actual phrase, reported in LeMonde IIRC,
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
AFAIK Iran is building several reactors. The big power reactor
(approx. 1 GW) is
at Bushehr see
(http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/bushehr-intro.htm).
This is an informative article. Iran wants to produce 20% of its
electricity from nuclear power. The
The Russians keep complaining that they aren't getting paid by the
Iranians for nuke technology.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
AFAIK Iran is building several reactors. The big power reactor
(approx. 1 GW) is
at Bushehr see
(http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/bushehr-intro.htm).
This is an informative article. Iran wants to produce 20% of its
electricity
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Honestly, I do not see how the US or any what other country can
object to this.
Perhaps the fact that the president of Iran asserted that their goal
is to erase Israel from the map has something to do with it.
Of course I realize he says that, but for that matter
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Honestly, I do not see how the US or any what other country can
object to this.
Perhaps the fact that the president of Iran asserted that their goal
is to erase Israel from the map has something to do with it.
Of course I realize he says
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 15:47, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
The Iranians are destroying their own oil fields without help from
us. Their fields are in such poor shape from mismanagement and bad
technology that the country will soon not be able to produce enough
for its
I've also heard Iran has to import gasoline
because their oil refining capacity is limited.
Harry
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
The Iranians are destroying their own oil fields
without help from us. Their fields are in such poor shape from
mismanagement and bad
On 2/20/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy water reactor??
Surely you jest.
Terry
Terry Blanton wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy water reactor??
Ah. Is that what they want to build? Google describes it:
New satellite imagery obtained by ISIS from
On 2/20/07, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well you have to begin somewhere. For example, Canada's first
reactor for power production was the 20 MW Nuclear Power Demonstration (NPD)
Reactor. It operated from 1962 to 1987.
For more historical and technical details see:
Harry Veeder wrote:
I thought they wanted a conventional power reactor, which, as I said,
makes sense even though they have lots of natural gas. A 50 MW unit
has nothing to do with energy generation, as Terry points out.
Well you have to begin somewhere. For example, Canada's first
reactor
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 2/20/07, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well you have to begin somewhere. For example, Canada's first
reactor for power production was the 20 MW Nuclear Power Demonstration (NPD)
Reactor. It operated from 1962 to 1987.
For more historical and technical
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 2/20/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy water reactor??
Surely you jest.
No jest, it was a serious
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:11:55 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Terry Blanton wrote:
Could this provide a possible explanation for why Iran may actually be
interested in a civilian nuclear power generation capability?
A 50 MW heavy water reactor??
Ah. Is that what they want
26 matches
Mail list logo