RE: [Vo]:Climate Threats

2012-12-05 Thread Zell, Chris
[mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:02 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Climate Threats This is un-effing-believable. An anonymous post is trumped up to supposedly show this great danger. Give me a break. Sent from my iPhone On Dec

Re: [Vo]:Climate Threats

2012-12-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote: ** A lack of threats? That depends what side offers safety and acceptance. http://www.climatedepot.com/a/1096/Execute-Skeptics-Shock-Call-To-Action-At-what-point-do-we-jail-or-execute-global-warming-deniers--Shouldnt-we-start-punishing-them-now Should

Re: [Vo]:Climate Threats

2012-12-04 Thread David Roberson
That is disgusting behavior and I can only assume that it is some one's idea of a joke. Perhaps if they are serious, then they should subject themselves to the same harsh punishment if the climate does not prove to be warming as a result of man's carbon emissions. Let's get serious. Dave

Re: [Vo]:Climate Threats

2012-12-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
This is un-effing-believable. An anonymous post is trumped up to supposedly show this great danger. Give me a break. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote: A lack of threats? That depends what side offers safety and acceptance.