RE: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit? Oragnization and performance

2008-03-10 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
to this, but this is the gist What do you think? Lawrence -Original Message- From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 5:21 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit? In reply to Lawrence de Bivort's message of Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:52:34

RE: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Lawrence de Bivort wrote: My general proposition is that when systems, like corporations, become 'too big' that due to the internal dynamics of bigness they come to act overall at a mediocre level of intelligence. This does seem to be the case. This and other related problems are described

RE: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-09 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
to study the dynamics I allude to. And, no, Ford and GM have not been clients of mine. Unfortunately. Cheers, Lawrence -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:39 PM To: vortex Subject: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit? SNIP

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-09 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Lawrence de Bivort's message of Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:52:34 -0400: Hi, [snip] Partly it is a matter of Reverting to the Mean, and partly a matter of there being only so many genuinely brilliant leaders and with size their net impact is diluted by the inevitable bulk of mediocre people in

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-08 Thread R C Macaulay
- From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit? Terry Blanton wrote: I can't allow the denigration of engineers in the automotive industry continue. I had a friend who was an engineering

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-08 Thread PHILIP WINESTONE
Disturbing the Universe by Freeman Dyson. This is what you could call one-dimensional thinking. P. - Original Message From: R C Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:33:41 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit? Howdy Vorts, People

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-08 Thread R C Macaulay
Yep, Philip, We have unit 3 4 nuke plant starting construction soon at Bay City Texas.. part of the South Texas project. They are having their share of the problems using a Jap design .. plus the environmental problems to overcome. The problem with Nukes are... They can operate some 40-50

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:58:06 -0600: Hi, [snip] Yep, Philip, We have unit 3 4 nuke plant starting construction soon at Bay City Texas.. part of the South Texas project. They are having their share of the problems using a Jap design .. plus the environmental

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-07 Thread thomas malloy
Terry Blanton wrote: I can't allow the denigration of engineers in the automotive industry continue. I had a friend who was an engineering manager in Detroit I agree, IMHO, it's the MBA's and the lawyers. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-06 Thread Terry Blanton
I can't allow the denigration of engineers in the automotive industry continue. I had a friend who was an engineering manager in Detroit and he said that the reason they built $hitty cars was management and marketing. The engineers battled constantly for design and manufacturing standards only

RE: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-05 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
Jones, in fairness, your truncation does miss my point. Repost with the full quotation beyond the '...' and I'll be glad to respond. Lawrence -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 11:07 AM To: vortex Subject: [Vo]:Re: Tooo

Re: [Vo]:Re: Tooo obvious for Detroit?

2008-03-05 Thread Mike Carrell
MC: Jones is a very sophistcated and clever man, author of thought-provoking posts. But he can missd the point in a very complex subject. People in general, including Jones, do the best they can within the vision that they have and organizations they work for. - snip ...even through in