Grimer wrote:
At 12:26 pm 12/04/2006 -0500, Harry wrote:
If you are bicycling fast enough you can cross a
wooden plank spanning ditch before the plank breaks.
Normally we say this is because it takes time for the
plank to deform and break when subjected to a weight.
However, consider
Grimer wrote..
The problem with Gravity is that most laymen think of it as a Force.
And the problem with the layman's notion of Force is that it is a static
concept which does not involve time.
It is reminiscent of the way that an electron jumps from one level to
another. Where is the
actually, its opposite. its been shown that as velocity increases, the objects mass increases as well.
On 4/12/06, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are bicycling fast enough you can cross a wooden plank spanning ditchbefore the plank breaks.
Normally we say this is because it takes
Title: Re: moving vs stationary weights
Those tests focus on inertial mass instead of gravitational mass.
Harry
leaking pen wrote:
actually, its opposite. its been shown that as velocity increases, the objects mass increases as well.
On 4/12/06, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
actually, there have been tests done showing theres no difference between the two. a steel ball deflection test in which they measured the change in deflection from a large aircraft passing over at different speeds. sr71, i believe, at the same time as they did the atomic clock testing, showing
I believe you should check out Kozyrev ( sp?) on this subject. He
claimed that motion could change mass ( at non relativistic speeds).
Rex research might have one or more of his papers.
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:26
Title: Re: moving vs stationary weights
This test is not like those tests.
Harry
leaking pen wrote:
actually, there have been tests done showing theres no difference between the two. a steel ball deflection test in which they measured the change in deflection from a large aircraft passing
Zell, Chris wrote:
I believe you should check out Kozyrev ( sp?) on this subject. He
claimed that motion could change mass ( at non relativistic speeds).
Rex research might have one or more of his papers.
Ok thanks for the suggestion.
Harry
8 matches
Mail list logo
