Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:56 pm 11-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
snip
I think any measure of weight, is really a measure of inertia.
Thus a change in weight is really a change in the inertia of the body.
The only way to definitely measure a change in gravity is to measure the
At 03:24 pm 12-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now if I were to circle the earth at orbital velocity then I would experience
equilibrium between two quite distinct forces the gravitational force acting
downwards and the inertial force acting upwards.
Then you
OK, the politics of antic semantics or semantic antics
are getting threadbare. Time for a chew toy.
One of the voices in the wilderness of gravity and
antigravity research that I have never seen kicked
around here on Vortex is the eternally running
campaign by Uncle Al Schwartz having to do with
Nick Reiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, the politics of antic semantics or semantic antics
are getting threadbare. Time for a chew toy.
One of the voices in the wilderness of gravity and
antigravity research that I have never seen kicked
around here on Vortex is the eternally running
At 02:56 pm 11-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
snip
I think any measure of weight, is really a measure of inertia.
Thus a change in weight is really a change in the inertia of the body.
The only way to definitely measure a change in gravity is to measure the
time of fall from a given height.
As you
5 matches
Mail list logo