Re: chew toys and eotvos

2005-01-12 Thread Harry Veeder
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 02:56 pm 11-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote: snip I think any measure of weight, is really a measure of inertia. Thus a change in weight is really a change in the inertia of the body. The only way to definitely measure a change in gravity is to measure the

Re: chew toys and eotvos

2005-01-12 Thread Grimer
At 03:24 pm 12-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote: Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I were to circle the earth at orbital velocity then I would experience equilibrium between two quite distinct forces the gravitational force acting downwards and the inertial force acting upwards. Then you

chew toys and eotvos

2005-01-11 Thread Nick Reiter
OK, the politics of antic semantics or semantic antics are getting threadbare. Time for a chew toy. One of the voices in the wilderness of gravity and antigravity research that I have never seen kicked around here on Vortex is the eternally running campaign by Uncle Al Schwartz having to do with

Re: chew toys and eotvos

2005-01-11 Thread Harry Veeder
Nick Reiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, the politics of antic semantics or semantic antics are getting threadbare. Time for a chew toy. One of the voices in the wilderness of gravity and antigravity research that I have never seen kicked around here on Vortex is the eternally running

Re: chew toys and eotvos

2005-01-11 Thread Grimer
At 02:56 pm 11-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote: snip I think any measure of weight, is really a measure of inertia. Thus a change in weight is really a change in the inertia of the body. The only way to definitely measure a change in gravity is to measure the time of fall from a given height. As you