Re: end of science?

2005-03-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could it be that scientific discoverys are also subject to the bell curve and we made be over the rise portion . Some thing to think about anyhow.-GES-

end of science?

2005-03-13 Thread thomas malloy
Richard posted; and Keith Nagel continued; With all due respect, you're sounding like that fellow Horgan we we discussing earlier in the week, who believes that all science has been done and nothing new will be discovered. I'm reminded of the question of Chi. IMHO, it is the fifth great force in

End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Jones Beene
or end of respectabilityfor "Scientific American"? Recently some geniuscommented that at his death Bethe had almost witnessed the "end of science"...John Horgan couldn't agree more. Horganis a senior writer for the stogy, intransigent and way-past-its-prime m

Re: End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Horace Heffner
At 10:35 AM 3/10/5, Jones Beene wrote: Oops another eldritch-errata, it is only fari to allow his pre-buttal, no? Sorry. There was no intent in my notoriously dyslexic spelling to imply anything about Mr. Horgan's sexual preferences. Usually the MS spell-checker steps-in and saves me from

Re: End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: I've been using a freeware version of Eudora for about 10 years now. It has no spelling checker. You should get the paid version. It is much better and it does have a spelling checker. - Jed

Re: End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Jones Beene
- Original Message - From: Horace Heffner I've also noticed that the probability of finding the error upon proofreading is inversely proportional to the above, as is the time interval after pressing send before the error is noticed. I suppose these observations are merely corollaries

Re: End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Horace Heffner
At 3:32 PM 3/10/5, Jed Rothwell wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Horace Heffner wrote: I've been using a freeware version of Eudora for about 10 years now. It has no spelling checker. You should get the paid version. It is much better and it does have a spelling

Re: End of Science

2005-03-10 Thread Grimer
for as long as it could, finally did a modest and slightly negative assessment - hoping, one supposes, that this nonsense would just go away, since it doesn't fit into their end-of-science mega-theme. It hasn't gone away. snip Stimulated by Tuttle's incisive post I googled *Negative refraction