Well, since the French translation doesn't come... ;-)
Heatless explosion, interesting, I had never heard of this although when you
think about it there are well known chemical reactions where volume increases
while heat is absorbed, namely evaporations, so if you combine any
heat-releasing
Getting from cellulose (biomass wastes) to petrofuels by thermchemical means is
hampered by the
propensity of low temperature formation of char due to promotion of high
exotherm Carbon-Carbon bonds.
Might a low temperature-high pressure hydroreforming process ( less than100 C )
using a
Well, since the French translation doesn't come... ;-)
Heatless explosion, interesting, I had never heard of this although when you
think about it there are well known chemical reactions where volume increases
while heat is absorbed, namely evaporations, so if you combine any
heat-releasing
If this gets through with the subject line intact, then the subject line
disappearing problem is related to the body of the message, since I am replying
to the same post as I replied in my previous post which did lose the subject
line.
If it doesn't... well I don't know :)
Michel
I'm not sure I follow you.
If the Vort messaging system stripped the subject line from your original
post how could your subsequent post suddenly have the subject line placed
back in - if you are replying using a subsequent post where the subject line
no longer exists. Or is that not what you're
thomas malloy wrote:
Michael Jullian wrote;
\
Sorry if he is a friend of yours, but maybe his particular definition
for COP can be guessed by reading this page...
http://www.randi.org/jr/051702.html
(in which Naudin is mistakenly taken for a scientist BTW, Randi even
calls him Dr Naudin
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!
Great, so $1360 a month, .
Ends up about $800 for me a month, not including picking up my fiancee from
her workplace. I suppose she could quit working
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!
Turn up the heater, do go for a drive in the summer and find less
depressing music and maybe environment.
Unfortunately, I can't turn off my thoughts. My
Michel Jullian wrote:
If this gets through with the subject line intact, then the subject line
disappearing problem is related to the body of the message, since I am replying
to the same post as I replied in my previous post which did lose the subject line.
If it doesn't... well I don't
Did anyone listen to Coast to Coast AM (replay) last night where the skeptic
Michael Shermer, director of The Skeptics Society, kept using Cold Fusion as a
prime example of a debacle hoax.
For those working in cold fusion, is cold fusion real?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Re: Re: Loop closed? (was Re: High efficiency electrolysis)
I'm not sure I follow you.
If the Vort messaging system stripped the subject line
Hi,
Does anyone have access to a long wavelength LED = 1300 nm? If so then I would
***very much*** appreciate it if you could perform a simple voltage measurement
experiment, or better yet I would be more than happy to purchase your mid-IR LED.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
I think you're correct Michel. Hopefully researchers will *never* lose patience
or hope!!! All good things usually take time. Perhaps this is a poor example,
but it took ~21 years for Einsteins paper on the Photoelectric effect to result
in the official name Photon. Or ~87 years to birth QM.
In answer to your question, cold fusion is real. In fact it is more
real than is the uninformed opinion of Michael Shermer. By this I mean,
cold fusion is a phenomenon of nature that has been witnessed now by
hundreds of people. Obviously, Michael Shermer has not taken the
responsibility to
Paul probably meant in your experience, could you e.g. relate when you last
witnessed the effect personally Ed?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
My last successful heat production was about 6 months ago. At the
present time, the effect is initiated by chance when the required
conditions happen to be in place. We do not yet know how to create the
conditions on purpose. However, I can tell you a lot of conditions that
don't work,
It's a chicken and egg problem, money can only come with demonstrable success,
and success once every 6 months is hard to demonstrate obviously.
What was the magnitude of your last heat production BTW, in terms of COP?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michel Jullian wrote:
It's a chicken and egg problem, money can only come with demonstrable success,
Many eggs have been laid. The chickens are now growing.
Success has now been demonstrated over 200 times and people who study
the effect every day have a much better success rate than
CF is not at the What's the good stage yet I am afraid. What was the COP
then?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer
...
What was the
BlankHowdy Vorts,
I cannot find the source, but I recall reading somewhere that experiments using
microwave have produced ozone gas and isotopes of Oxygen up to O7. Anyone know
about such a process ?
Richard
Blank Bkgrd.gif
Description: GIF image
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21596hed=U.S.+Funds+Shine+%24168M+on+Solarsector=Industriessubsector=Energy
-
The U.S. Department of Energy on Thursday announced it will invest $168 million
in 13 solar technology projects in the next three years as a move to bring down
the
The criteria of Indisputability is excessive.
If this what the physics community demands, then it has
become a kind of Church in possesion of indisputable truths.
I think it is enough to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l36272x3106h58p5/
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991SvJPP..17.1159S
On 3/11/2007, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BlankHowdy Vorts,
I cannot find the source, but I recall reading somewhere that experiments
using microwave have produced ozone gas and
Using the 'find similar' feature on the Harvard Site, this one comes up:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1999SPIE.3571..229Bamp;db_key=PHYamp;data_type=HTMLamp;format=amp;high=45f369a03b24421
Interesting that there are dozens of these papers, coming out of Russia
and
I confess that I pulled the toll of $1 per mile out of a hat. The correct
figure should be ~$0.25 per mile. This is based on the average fuel efficiency
of U.S. cars (20 mpg) and the cost and damage caused by burning a gallon of gas
($5). The cost including buiding roads, and damage includes
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!
I confess that I pulled the toll of $1 per mile out of a hat. The correct
figure should be ~$0.25 per mile. This
26 matches
Mail list logo
