it looks interesting (for some time I thought Climeon was working on that,
but it was just a COR/organic rankine) but one problem with thermionic is
that it require huge temperatures, like 700-1700C...
700C is acessible to gas+powder LENR today, but not much more...
2013/12/9
there is a article which reemerged recently
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4f1c41e8-e66e-11e1-ac5f-00144feab49a.html#ixzz2mmm0p3oy
on FT.com
if you add that one
http://www.lbl.gov/LBL-PID/Nobelists/Seaborg/presidents/23.html
you realize what was the proble...
as some says here, there are thousands
I think Fleischmann and Pons were unlucky, very unlucky
and have been confronted with an insolvable problem
at the moment of their historical discovery. The idea came much before its
time, and it was done in the
worst system. Science and experimental- anlytical
means were not good enough then to
Hi all
Nobel winner declares boycott of Nature and other top science journals
Randy Schekman says his lab will no longer send papers to Nature, Cell and
Science as they distort scientific process
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals?CMP=fb_gu
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
APL -- I've just learned about a programming language I hadn't heard of
before.
*A Programming Language (APL) *has an interesting provenance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language)
Geeze. looks like they have reinvented the triode.
From: Alain Sepeda
it looks interesting (for some time I thought Climeon was working on that,
but it was just a COR/organic rankine) but one problem with thermionic is
that it require huge temperatures, like 700-1700C...
700C is
This is a breath of fresh air. It is similar to what Pam Boss et al. wrote
in the JCMNS the other day:
How the Flawed Journal Review Process Impedes Paradigm Shifting Discoveries
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedk.pdf#page=6
Someone quoted in that article makes an important point: The system is not
meritocratic. You don't necessarily see the best papers published in those
journals. The editors are not professional scientists, they are journalists
which isn't necessarily the greatest problem, but they emphasise novelty
as i says in the article,
there is a sad tendency to focus on easy frauds debunked quickly,
and to miss the huge failure of big Journals like natureco :
- Pal -review, kingmakers, kerberos... which prevent enemies to publish .
many case identified today from different source, and minimized each
After many years, it looks like the EESTOR supercap fiasco is finally coming to
the bitter end. Zenn just announced their third set of independent test
results, and it is finally confirmed that the EESU doesn't work, as some have
suspected all along.
The fourth comment following the recent posting -
'New generator creates electricity directly from heat'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/dec/09/new-generator-creates-electricity-directly-from-heat
COMMENT: 'maximum Carnot efficiency'
A 40% efficiency is nice, but over 90% is
DGT has revealed that their reactor produces a 1.0 to 1.6 tesla magnetic
field at 20 cms from the center of the reaction.
A nano-scaled electrical conversion process that utilizes changes in this
magnetic field to produce electron flow holds promise to provide a highly
efficient source of
more...
We could use the nantenna system to capture the energy of the magnetic
field and convent that pulsing magnetic energy into electron flow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantenna
I would modify the design of the nantenna shape to include a fractal
antenna design for wide band EMF capture.
More...
Another way to harvest the energy from a Ni/H LENR based magnetic field is
to use a 850 type piezoelectric material (American Piezo Ceramics
International, Ltd.) [
http://www.americanpiezo.com/apc-materials/piezoelectric-properties.html]
sandwiched between two Neodymium permanent magnets
Axil,
Could you clarify what the center of the reaction is?
Hopefully Defkalion is real.
-- LP
Axil wrote:
DGT has revealed that their reactor produces a 1.0 to 1.6 tesla magnetic
field at 20 cms from the center of the reaction.
A nano-scaled electrical conversion process that utilizes
DGT uses a nickel foam mess impregnated with three grams of specially
treated nickel micro-powder. I call the center of that form as the center
of the reaction.
DGT has produced a demo of their reactor for !CCF-18. Make up your own
mind.
Have you seen an data describing the frequency distribution of the AC component
of the magnetic field? I am of the opinion that this field is almost
completely DC in nature with low frequency fluctuations. The nano antennas are
tuned to work at extremely high frequencies.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Analog Fan
For anyone who has followed this [EEStor] fiasco over the years, it's an
incredible example of inventor self-deception and lack of due diligence,
coupled with lax Canadian markets which make it easy for predatory 'pump and
dump' schemes.
You got
Binging a natural and random process, it is very probable that the magnetic
fields produced by the Ni/H reactor will be variable in intensity and
polarity.
No doubt, there is a wide range of capture designs put forth that can
optimize the power conversion of this type of magnetic field based on
I know little about the situation at DGT, and I am not inclined to pry into
people's business. I do have two pieces of hard information which put
things in a bad light:
1. They never paid me the grand they owe me. They are either broke or
dishonest.
2. Some questions were raised about the flow
In my opinion, the data revealed in the two Defkalion papers for ICCF-17
and ICCF-18 contains a wealth of information or all those who take that
information seriously.
There is however a blind spot to such data formed when it speaks against
the long held and most cherished theories and
http://phys.org/news/2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormhole.html
Creation of entanglement simultaneously gives rise to a wormhole
The quarks are connected by a wormhole that exists in the 5th dimension
where space and time does not exist.
We can see this multi-dimensional
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, the data revealed in the two Defkalion papers for ICCF-17
and ICCF-18 contains a wealth of information or all those who take that
information seriously.
I always take information seriously. But I have seen many, many
experimental errors.
Let me reaffirm that Defkalion has every right to demand NDAs from their
visitors. There is nothing unethical or unusual about keeping a product
like this under wraps.
However, they cannot expect people to fully accept the claims as long as
they stick to this policy. They have a binary choice:
I believe Axil is saying that researchers have not discounted the existence
of transmutations themselves, but rather have discounted the correlation
between excess heat and transmutations. It is similar to claims made
by Larsen and Krivit amongst others.
Unfortunately there remains very little
*independently replicated hey…*
Experiments by Piantelli have shown a connection between transmutation and
heat: 6 MeV is produced when a proton cooper pair is absorbed by a nickel
atom. A 6 MeV proton is detected as an energetic particle emanation from a
copper atom as seen in a cloud chamber
26 matches
Mail list logo
