Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion comic book "Discover Cold Fusion"

2020-09-15 Thread William Beaty
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Terry Blanton wrote: L5.95GBP or ~$7.65USD, 32pp., "Limited Print Edition" w/thicker cover If you can afford it. One copy is $18.20 with shipping. I paid $54+ship for five copies, shipping appears to be flat rate $15.25USD

Re: [Vo]:Out of 1920

2020-09-15 Thread William Beaty
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Frank Znidarsic wrote: with this arrangement I can unplug them.  These earphones are of a 3000 ohm high impedance design.  The voice coil goes over a fixed magnet.  The magnet operates on a thin steel armature with no electrical connections on it.  The sound is very tinny

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion comic book "Discover Cold Fusion"

2020-09-15 Thread Terry Blanton
I only bought the one. I certainly would have loved to send one to Bob Parks; but, I suppose science IS advancing by funerals. Cheers! On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:37 AM William Beaty wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > L5.95GBP or ~$7.65USD, 32pp., "Limited Print Edition"

Re: [Vo]:Heat from under our feet?

2020-09-15 Thread H LV
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:22 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to H LV's message of Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:59 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >She isn't interested in how the heat is conveyed to the surface. Her > >argument is that it can`t be discounted. > > Whether or not it can be discounted depends on how

Re: [Vo]:Heat from under our feet?

2020-09-15 Thread H LV
I wrote: > Count Rumfordd would say on the nightside the Earth is cooled by > frigorific rays from space, whereby the frigorific rays > slow the movements of atoms. He had this interesting conception of > radiation as being capable of either heating or cooling, i.e. accelerating > or dampening

Re: [Vo]:Heat from under our feet?

2020-09-15 Thread Robin
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400: Hi Harry, Are you getting bored because of the low level of activity on Vortex? :)

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
We do currently not publish the spectra as there are to many patent trolls like IH just waiting for it... But I have tons of files with interesting details. Anybody serious that is willing to support us either by labor or some significant financial support will get access to our knowledge.

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Robin
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:51:24 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] If the electrons are shrunken, then they may well tunnel along with the protons, making an enhanced electron capture process possible. A possibility which you may recall I first posted here in the thread

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
What we see in experiments is that H*-H* reacts like two neutrons. This in respect to the intermediate products we see. On the other side D*-D* reacts like two protons! J.W. On 14.09.2020 15:12, JonesBeene wrote: Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: … Dense Hydrogen. aka "Hydrino", aka H*-H* is a

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Jones Beene
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > What we see in experiments is that H*-H* reacts like two neutrons. This in > respect to the intermediate products we see. Are any of these experiments published ? Absorption of 2 neutrons when proved would be absolutely huge in importance, since AFAIK this does

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Jones Beene
Well, you could be getting inferior advice. It makes little sense to worry about IH or anyone else when a trip to Stockholm (for the big prize) is waiting for positive results showing H*-H* absorption... No one is going to get rich on this anyway, other than patent attorneys and Wall Street.

Re: [Vo]:The so-called "secret new weapon"

2020-09-15 Thread Jones Beene
Think about the implications of dense hydrogen in the role of binding and reacting with another (larger) nucleus as if were two neutrons. This is completely new physics. Such a discovery would open an entirely new world of overlooked nuclear reactions which were never given much hope before.

[Vo]:Count Rumford's theory of cooling and warming rays

2020-09-15 Thread H LV
The following is from _Pictet's experiment: The apparent radiation and reflection of cold_ by James Evans and Brian Popp (1985). (google search for full pdf paper) I think Evan's and Popp's criticism of Rumford's theory in the last paragraph below is mistaken. It is only the relative difference

Re: [Vo]:Count Rumford's theory of cooling and warming rays

2020-09-15 Thread H LV
Sorry about the OCR errors in the last post. I cleaned them up in this post... The following is from _Pictet's experiment: The apparent radiation and reflection of cold_ by James Evans and Brian Popp (1985). (google search for full pdf paper) I think Evan's and Popp's criticism of Rumford's

Re: [Vo]:Heat from under our feet?

2020-09-15 Thread H LV
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:59 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400: > Hi Harry, > > Are you getting bored because of the low level of activity on Vortex? :) > > Physics needs some fizzle. Harry