Re: [Vo]: Stan Meyer - Autopsy Report
-Original Message- From: Grimer Any lawyers wish to comment? 8-) <><><><><><> IANAL, however, do you know if the coroner was a pathologist? In many places the coroner doesn't have to be even a medical doctor. Terry ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Re: [VO]: Stan Meyer- Autopsy Report
Grimer wrote.. recently contacted someone who had gone to thetrouble of obtaining Stan Meyer's autopsy report.The following was his interesting reply. === The autopsy report makes no mention of the often rumored "food poisoning" and the death is ruled as being natural, caused by a cerebral aneurysm (this would account for the violent vomiting in the parking lot). However, if Stan did indeed have a water fuel cell which functioned as he claimed, I am much more inclined to think Stan was poisoned and the coroner was paid off to make it look like a natural death. Since the coroner (William R. Adrion) had exclusive access to the body, no one else verified his findings, and he could have said virtually anything about the manner in which Stan died. However, the coroner's report is required to have information regarding the circumstances surrounding the death... and there were many witnesses. In other words, while the manner in which Stan died could not be corroborated by anyone else, and thus could be faked, the circumstances surrounding his death had witnesses, and thus, could not be faked. In this section, it reads: "Decedent supposedly at lunch with N.A.T.O. officials at a Cracker Barrel diner. The group made an opening toast with cranberry juice, immediately after which, decedent ran outside followed by his brother, then vomited violently and told his brother that he had been poisoned." Howdy Frank.. A Coroner, holding a neo-political office, would not, as a general rule , never comment on " circumstance surrounding" a case. They use the word " undetermined" and let it go at that. To make any comment is beyond the scope of their medical training and casts suspicion They are not in the speculation business, A writer , Wm.D.Pease's novel.. " The Monkey's Fist", weaves an insightful story of wheels within wheels, the goings on of people in levels of black ops that get carried away with their importance. The results are not too unlike the account of the 3 armies as recorded in 2Chronicles chptr 20. We are witnessing a similar event on the world stage at present... not over yet.. but beginning. Richard
[Vo]: Stan Meyer - Autopsy Report
I recently contacted someone who had gone to the trouble of obtaining Stan Meyer's autopsy report. The following was his interesting reply. === The autopsy report makes no mention of the often rumored "food poisoning" and the death is ruled as being natural, caused by a cerebral aneurysm (this would account for the violent vomiting in the parking lot). However, if Stan did indeed have a water fuel cell which functioned as he claimed, I am much more inclined to think Stan was poisoned and the coroner was paid off to make it look like a natural death. Since the coroner (William R. Adrion) had exclusive access to the body, no one else verified his findings, and he could have said virtually anything about the manner in which Stan died. However, the coroners report is required to have information regarding the circumstances surrounding the death... and there were many witnesses. In other words, while the manner in which Stan died could not be corroborated by anyone else, and thus could be faked, the circumstances surrounding his death had witnesses, and thus, could not be faked. In this section, it reads: "Decedent supposedly at lunch with N.A.T.O. officials at a Cracker Barrel diner. The group made an opening toast with cranberry juice, immediately after which, decedent ran outside followed by his brother, then vomited violently and told his brother that he had been poisoned." I find it interesting that the coroner writes, "supposedly." I wonder how many other reports he puts "supposedly" on. It is an unprofessional and unusual statement of disbelief. To me this is the coroner's way of saying to the public, "it is doubtful," which is completely unnecessary and makes me feel like he is trying to lead you away from believing that material in this section which he was forced to write truthfully. I would love to know more of the story behind what happened that night. Steve Meyer watched as his brother vomited and lay dying before his eyes. What does he believe? Is Steve carrying on Stan's work, but in a different format...one that could possibly get its foot in the door of big oil? Oliver Stone needs to make a movie out of this. Now is the perfect time. Any lawyers wish to comment? 8-) Frank