In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:27:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
1. Cathode wire will be gold, 0.010 inch diameter. Galileo was
silver. Gold is chosen because later SPAWAR work showed much more
neutron evidence with a gold cathode. I'd say that nobody knows why.
But
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message:
1. Cathode wire will be gold, 0.010 inch diameter. Galileo was
silver. Gold is chosen because later SPAWAR work showed much more
neutron evidence with a gold cathode. I'd say that nobody knows
Thank you for reading that old paper.
An other idea is the the process is very superficial and extremely local and
this was not taken in account by the theorists.
Because you was very nice to explain me your personal program in the field,
I want to tell
you with absolute sincerity what I think
I' m really grateful for this report of your interesting work. I have to
confess that my priority and focus are different- I hope that CF will lead
to an energy technology. However I will follow you progress with total
empathy and with all my crossable parts crossed.
More in my other message. Have
This leads to a question:
What is better?
a) 6 times~ 10% heat excess
b) 2 times 500% heat excess, 4 times...no heat excess
Taking in account that 10% is a scientific curiosity, 500% is of
technological interest.
By the way, what are the performances of Melvin Miles' system?
Thank you for any
At 02:07 AM 3/24/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
This leads to a question:
What is better?
a) 6 times~ 10% heat excess
b) 2 times 500% heat excess, 4 times...no heat excess
Taking in account that 10% is a scientific curiosity, 500% is of
technological interest.
By the way, what are the performances
Thank you, Abd! We have to wait anyway till we know Melvin's results.
However, based on my long experience in the field I think that the cathodes
belong to three
categories or castes - inactive, talented (10- 30% heat excess) and geniuses
(say 500 excess or more)
I have never met an example of
At 12:33 PM 3/24/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
Thank you, Abd! We have to wait anyway till we know Melvin's results.
However, based on my long experience in the field I think that the
cathodes belong to three
categories or castes - inactive, talented (10- 30% heat excess) and
geniuses (say 500
As with people, genius cathodes are rare- Martin and Stanley had one, Mizuno
had the best, Energetics had cathode no 64, Piantelli had one in the early
stage of development.. I have no complete list just now. Perhaps Jed is more
systematic than me.
Air is polluted almost everywhere, I am not
At 03:52 PM 3/24/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf
Very interesting. I picked up particularly on the comment that
paradoxically, lack of reproducibility has an amazingly great
informational value.
That's absolutely right, except in narrow
-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miles' new recipe for codeposition
At 03:52 PM 3/24/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
If I understand you correctly, you are performing experimental work and
your ideas
In the ACS press conference video Miles states he has a new recipe
for codeposition that produced excess heat 6 out of 6 times. Is
there a copy of his paper available yet, or any other information?
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
At 08:03 PM 3/23/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
In the ACS press conference video Miles states he has a new recipe
for codeposition that produced excess heat 6 out of 6 times. Is
there a copy of his paper available yet, or any other information?
My general impression has been that codeposition
13 matches
Mail list logo
