Re: [Vo]:Definition of heat after death

2011-08-27 Thread Joe Catania
Again thermal inertia is a fact- not an if. Thermail inertia does not run out after one minute as I have shown. A large thermal mass of over 1MJ will not run out in a minute if there's only a kilowatt of cooling. Its you who are confused- cold fusion jargon? There is no cold fusion that can be

Re: [Vo]:Definition of heat after death

2011-08-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
Joe Catania zrosumg...@aol.com wrote: ** Again thermal inertia is a fact- not an if. Thermail inertia does not run out after one minute as I have shown. You have asserted that, but in order to show it you would have to demonstrate that the specific heat of metal is much higher than the

Re: [Vo]:Definition of heat after death

2011-08-27 Thread Joe Catania
- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 1:35 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Definition of heat after death Joe Catania zrosumg...@aol.com wrote: Again thermal inertia is a fact- not an if. Thermail inertia does not run out after one minute as I have

Re: [Vo]:Definition of heat after death

2011-08-27 Thread Horace Heffner
On Aug 27, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Joe Catania wrote: For the umpteenth time it is not an assertion. The thermal mass of the reactor is about 1MJ (based on specific heat), the energy outflow is a mere fraction (~1kW). OK? There has been no demonstration that output is higher than inout.