RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion
My previous comment was not complete. It should be: The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Unified Gravity device appears to present. No gammas and only charged particles is the big difference that favors Unified Gravity. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 9:39:32 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Terry Blanton Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html The following is taken from the link noted above: Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html
RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion
The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Terry Blanton Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html The following is taken from the link noted above: Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html
RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion
Terry— I agree. The new stuff is the extra data that seems to support the theory. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Terry Blanton Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html The following is taken from the link noted above: Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html
Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion
And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html >> >> The following is taken from the link noted above: >> > Hey, Jones, we've been here before: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html > >
Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html > > The following is taken from the link noted above: > Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html