Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck  wrote:

It is perfectly possible she is even more upset wit Rossi then you, but
> perhaps she could tell it.
>

She told me! Vociferously. Ask her yourself.



> Was she on the list of people to which Industrial Heat has complained
> early?
>

Ask her yourself.



> Real Riossi siupporters are focused on EC ats, excess heat, QuarkX,
> explanation, lack of radiation.
>

I will address all of these issues for you:

There is no excess heat. The e-cats are all fake. QuarkX is nothing more
than a blurry photo of a blue LED. The explanation is simple: it is all
fake. If it were real everyone in the warehouse would be dead from the
heat. There is no radiation because there is no reaction.



> Are you happy with the proofs IH offers for no excess heat?
>

Yes. The observers are alive and they would be dead if there were 1 MW of
heat. If there were 100 kW of heat they would all be very hot, and everyone
reported the room was cool. You cannot ask for better proof than that.



> Why is IH not publishing the ERV Report, if that could solve anything?
>

You will have to ask them that.



> Why are IH's e-supporters such clumsy bulllies?
>

Who are we are bullying? You? Rossi? That is your imagination.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Peter Gluck]

That's interesting, Pam Boss and her colleagues has done a great work for
LSNR- just in time for the coming (or already here) DoD Report for the
Senate.
It is perfectly possible she is even more upset wit Rossi then you, but
perhaps she could tell it. Was she on the list of people to which
Industrial Heat has complained early?

You and Renzzie are the real prisoners of the Rossi Planet, hatred driven
trying to demonstrate he is evel- the person. Real Riossi siupporters are
focused on EC ats, excess heat, QuarkX, explanation, lack of radiation.
whatever technical, scientific, managerial and now- legal issues.
Are you happy with the proofs IH offers for no excess heat?
Why is IH not publishing the ERV Report, if that could solve anything?
Why are IH's e-supporters such clumsy bulllies?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Jed Rothwell 
wrote:

> Stephen A. Lawrence  wrote:
>
> And that's just a start.  Once you start looking, there's *lots* of
>> information on the Internet about the mind control towers and how they
>> cause people to hear voices in their heads.
>>
>
>> And now we find out our very own Peter Gluck has been targeted by the
>> mind control people.  This is so sad.
>>
>
> It is deplorable. As Mr. Quayle said, a mind is a terrible thing to lose.
>
>
> Perhaps I should not beat a dead horse but . . .
>
> Peter Gluck  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for
>>> thinking differently.
>>> Now when he is also a Rossi opponent . . .
>>>
>>
>> Many people who support cold fusion also oppose Rossi.
>>
>
> I think Pam Boss is even more upset with Rossi than I am. So according to
> Peter Gluck, Pam and many other researchers no longer support cold fusion.
> Such a shame! She contributed so much, but alas she has been cast out by
> The Faithful. The *sine qua non* of support for cold fusion has become
> "support for Rossi." That according to Gluck and other hostages on Planet
> Rossi.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Stephen A. Lawrence  wrote:

And that's just a start.  Once you start looking, there's *lots* of
> information on the Internet about the mind control towers and how they
> cause people to hear voices in their heads.
>

> And now we find out our very own Peter Gluck has been targeted by the mind
> control people.  This is so sad.
>

It is deplorable. As Mr. Quayle said, a mind is a terrible thing to lose.


Perhaps I should not beat a dead horse but . . .

Peter Gluck  wrote:
>
>
>> As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for
>> thinking differently.
>> Now when he is also a Rossi opponent . . .
>>
>
> Many people who support cold fusion also oppose Rossi.
>

I think Pam Boss is even more upset with Rossi than I am. So according to
Peter Gluck, Pam and many other researchers no longer support cold fusion.
Such a shame! She contributed so much, but alas she has been cast out by
The Faithful. The *sine qua non* of support for cold fusion has become
"support for Rossi." That according to Gluck and other hostages on Planet
Rossi.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Stephen A. Lawrence]

On 09/12/2016 02:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Peter Gluck > wrote:

"To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not
allowed to criticize (Voltaire)


Who are you talking about?


Sounds like maybe his wife?

Can't think of anyone else in that category, off hand.

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck  wrote:

I am abstaining heroically to tell that your brain arteries are only half
> full with blood.
>

A brain artery does not resemble an open pipe that pours water into an open
reservoir, like the one used in Rossi's 1-year test. Contrary to your
repeated assertions, partially filled open pipes do exist, such as the one
shown in this photo:

http://il3.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/3773036/thumb/1.jpg

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Peter Gluck]

and you beyond hope..
I am abstaining heroically to tell that your brain arteries are only half
full with blood.

the help is for readers

peter



On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Peter Gluck  wrote:
>
> "To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to
>> criticize (Voltaire)
>>
>
> Who are you talking about?
>
> You are clearly allowed to criticize me! You have been criticizing me
> mindlessly for weeks, while ignoring the facts.
>
>
>
>> You could better help with info from Japan re ICCF20
>>
>
> You are beyond help.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck  wrote:

"To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to
> criticize (Voltaire)
>

Who are you talking about?

You are clearly allowed to criticize me! You have been criticizing me
mindlessly for weeks, while ignoring the facts.



> You could better help with info from Japan re ICCF20
>

You are beyond help.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Esa J. Ruoho]

Thing is with articles of this ilk - the thing they are talking about is 
perpetually going to happen Very soon or at least right now or maybe tomorrow. 
The goalposts just keep on moving. 

Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa. Http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/ // 
+358403703659 // esaru...@gmail.com // http://youtube.com/c/LacklusterOfficial

> ChemE Stewart  kirjoitti 12.9.2016 kello 17.05:
> 
> "there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you"
> 
> They're out there...
> 
> http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/09/the-thought-police-are-coming-2464566.html
> 
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Esa Ruoho  wrote:
>> I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from 
>> Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably 
>> knows who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him 
>> - who they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think 
>> differently.
>> 
>> On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck is 
>> playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing 
>> meee Click here to see how!", then there is no 
>> actual person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.
>> 
>> The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind 
>> of wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this 
>> case, mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is 
>> nobody stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out 
>> of thinking like this or that.
>> 
>> So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as 
>> pointing out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually 
>> have any enemies out there that he is fighting against.
>> 
>> So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with 
>> hyperbole in the subjectline.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros  
>>> wrote:
>>> Jed
>>> You asked;
>>> 
>>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>> 
>>> Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous naive 
>>> mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has many 
>>> appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
>>> Thanks for explaining yourself.
>>> Kennett Thornros
>>> 
 On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:
 Peter Gluck wrote:
 
> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
 
 You brave soul! How admirable.
 
 Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
 
 - Jed
 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ---
>> http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // 
>> +358403703659 // 
>> skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage: 
>> esaru...@gmail.com //
> 

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Peter Gluck]

"To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to
criticize (Voltaire)

OIk, time out have finish my blog issue.
You could better help with info from Japan re ICCF20


peter

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Peter Gluck  wrote:
>
> Those who are contradicting you. Who thinks, appreciates things
>> differently.
>> For example citing you from memory: You can see who is your pressor
>> knowing whom you cannot contradict
>>
>> "A regarding the ERV report any sane individual instantly sees there was
>> NO excess heat.
>> You needed 5 minutes.
>>
>
> In this examples, I am disagreeing. Disagreeing is not "oppressing." Or,
> if it is, then you are oppressing nearly everyone in this field, and you
> are oppressing I.H.
>
> You cannot redefine "oppress" to mean whatever you like. Words don't work
> that way.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck  wrote:

Those who are contradicting you. Who thinks, appreciates things differently.
> For example citing you from memory: You can see who is your pressor
> knowing whom you cannot contradict
>
> "A regarding the ERV report any sane individual instantly sees there was
> NO excess heat.
> You needed 5 minutes.
>

In this examples, I am disagreeing. Disagreeing is not "oppressing." Or, if
it is, then you are oppressing nearly everyone in this field, and you are
oppressing I.H.

You cannot redefine "oppress" to mean whatever you like. Words don't work
that way.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Peter Gluck]

Those who are contradicting you. Who thinks, appreciates things differently.
For example citing you from memory: You can see who is your pressor knowing
whom you cannot contradict

"A regarding the ERV report any sane individual instantly sees there was NO
excess heat.
You needed 5 minutes.
IH has read 3 three-monthly ERV reports and had not li ved  this simple
revelation"
you said these, or you will deny?

Better let's focus on other things- e.g. when will we have the list of
posters at ICCF20 and the program of SSICCF20?
Are you participating?

peter




On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Peter Gluck  wrote:
>
>
>> As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for
>> thinking differently.
>> Now when he is also a Rossi opponent . . .
>>
>
> Many people who support cold fusion also oppose Rossi. You do not get to
> decide who supports cold fusion.
>
>
> Unfortunately he (Jed) is rude, opressive . . .
>>
>
> Be specific. Who am I oppressing? You? How am I doing this?
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[ROGER ANDERTON]

Edward Lewis, 80 Year Periodicity of Scientific Revolutions:
"Scientific revolutions in physics have happened at about 80 year intervals 
since 1506 when Copernicus introduced a heliocentric physics, explaining the 
fall of objects as the impetus of objects. Since then, in response to the 
experimental anomalies of their times, an individual has more or less 
independently of other people introduced new basic physics postulates— new 
concepts of the fall of objects, the nature of energy, and the causes of 
motion, and of matter and atoms. Thomas Kuhn called these episodes of 
theoretical change “Scientific Revolutions"
 ."In 1820, Faraday introduced the basic ideas of field theoryincorporating 
a point‐atom idea like that of 
Boscovich."http://www.sciencejunk.org/oldsite/80yearrevsesj.pdf

-- now long overdue the rest of the Scientific Revolution from Boscovich.











 

On Monday, 12 September 2016, 14:59, ROGER ANDERTON 
 wrote:
 

 >>>I am fighting for the right to think differently
History as I present: Copernican Revolution led to Existential Crisis; physical 
reality based on point-particle theory of Boscovich. Most people were not able 
to cope with that and had to retreat from full consequences of Copernican 
Revolution. I test to see if humans now able to cope with next step in mental 
evolution.
Modern physics based on Boscovich theory; Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, Feynman 
et al worked from Boscovich theory















 

On Monday, 12 September 2016, 14:36, Peter Gluck  
wrote:
 

 Dear Esa,
Thanks for your care and attention to my problems, but I am solving them, here 
it is how: (appended)
As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for thinking 
differently.Now when he is also a Rossi opponent he wants everybody to think as 
IH says it is thinking.Unfortunately he (Jed) is rude, opressive aggressive and 
irational. But this was over-discussed.and  enough was told.Esa, can you tell 
me why I am trying to get more clicks on my Blog? I am not publishing ads and 
at 79 my career is over. I am trying to get LENR info and to write about 
subjects relevant for LENR  my choice.
greetings,peter


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Esa Ruoho  wrote:

I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from 
Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably knows 
who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him - who 
they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think 
differently.
On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck is 
playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing 
meee Click here to see how!", then there is no actual 
person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.
The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind of 
wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this case, 
mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is nobody 
stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out of 
thinking like this or that.
So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as pointing 
out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually have any 
enemies out there that he is fighting against.
So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with hyperbole 
in the subjectline.


On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros  wrote:

Jed
You asked;Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking 
differently?Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an 
enormous naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth 
has many appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
Thanks for explaining yourself.
Kennett ThornrosOn Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  
wrote:

Peter Gluck wrote:


I am fighting for the right to think differently.

You brave soul! How admirable.
Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
- Jed





-- 
---http://twitter.com/esaruoho //  http://lackluster.bandcamp. com // 
+358403703659 // skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // 
iMessage: esaru...@gmail.com //



-- 
Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

   

   

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Stephen A. Lawrence]

They sure are out there!  See this article:

http://educate-yourself.org/mc/

And this:

http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/2013/10/25/ever-seen-a-mind-control-tower-bet-you-have/

And that's just a start.  Once you start looking, there's /lots/ of 
information on the Internet about the mind control towers and how they 
cause people to hear voices in their heads.


And now we find out our very own Peter Gluck has been targeted by the 
mind control people.  This is so sad.



On 09/12/2016 10:05 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote:

"there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you"

They're out there...

http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/09/the-thought-police-are-coming-2464566.html

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Esa Ruoho > wrote:


I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck
from Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then
he probably knows who he is fighting against, and how they have
shown themselves to him - who they are, what do they say, and how
do they resist his right to think differently.

On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that
Peter Gluck is playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e.
"They're suppressing meee Click here to
see how!", then there is no actual person, persons or group of
people who he has to fight against.

The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently"
is kind of wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own
home (in this case, mind), you are free to think whatever you want
to. There really is nobody stopping you, there's no mind-police
out there trying to zap you out of thinking like this or that.

So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus
as pointing out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does
not actually have any enemies out there that he is fighting against.

So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts
with hyperbole in the subjectline.



On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros
> wrote:

Jed
You asked;

Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?

Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an
enormous naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see
that the truth has many appearances sometimes in conflict but
true.
Thanks for explaining yourself.
Kennett Thornros

On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell" > wrote:

Peter Gluck wrote:

I am fighting for the right to think differently.


You brave soul! How admirable.

Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking
differently?

- Jed




-- 
---

http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com
 // +358403703659
 //
skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
esaru...@gmail.com  //

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[ChemE Stewart]

"there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you"

They're out there...

http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/09/the-thought-police-are-coming-2464566.html

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Esa Ruoho  wrote:

> I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from
> Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably
> knows who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him
> - who they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think
> differently.
>
> On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck
> is playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing
> meee Click here to see how!", then there is no
> actual person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.
>
> The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind
> of wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this
> case, mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is
> nobody stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out
> of thinking like this or that.
>
> So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as
> pointing out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually
> have any enemies out there that he is fighting against.
>
> So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with
> hyperbole in the subjectline.
>
>
>
> On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros 
> wrote:
>
>> Jed
>> You asked;
>>
>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>
>> Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous
>> naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has
>> many appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
>> Thanks for explaining yourself.
>> Kennett Thornros
>> On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Gluck wrote:
>>>
>>> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
>>>
>>>
>>> You brave soul! How admirable.
>>>
>>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //
> +358403703659 //
> skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
> esaru...@gmail.com //
>

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[ROGER ANDERTON]

>>>I am fighting for the right to think differently
History as I present: Copernican Revolution led to Existential Crisis; physical 
reality based on point-particle theory of Boscovich. Most people were not able 
to cope with that and had to retreat from full consequences of Copernican 
Revolution. I test to see if humans now able to cope with next step in mental 
evolution.
Modern physics based on Boscovich theory; Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, Feynman 
et al worked from Boscovich theory















 

On Monday, 12 September 2016, 14:36, Peter Gluck  
wrote:
 

 Dear Esa,
Thanks for your care and attention to my problems, but I am solving them, here 
it is how: (appended)
As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for thinking 
differently.Now when he is also a Rossi opponent he wants everybody to think as 
IH says it is thinking.Unfortunately he (Jed) is rude, opressive aggressive and 
irational. But this was over-discussed.and  enough was told.Esa, can you tell 
me why I am trying to get more clicks on my Blog? I am not publishing ads and 
at 79 my career is over. I am trying to get LENR info and to write about 
subjects relevant for LENR  my choice.
greetings,peter


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Esa Ruoho  wrote:

I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from 
Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably knows 
who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him - who 
they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think 
differently.
On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck is 
playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing 
meee Click here to see how!", then there is no actual 
person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.
The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind of 
wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this case, 
mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is nobody 
stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out of 
thinking like this or that.
So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as pointing 
out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually have any 
enemies out there that he is fighting against.
So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with hyperbole 
in the subjectline.


On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros  wrote:

Jed
You asked;Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking 
differently?Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an 
enormous naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth 
has many appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
Thanks for explaining yourself.
Kennett ThornrosOn Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  
wrote:

Peter Gluck wrote:


I am fighting for the right to think differently.

You brave soul! How admirable.
Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
- Jed





-- 
---http://twitter.com/esaruoho //  http://lackluster.bandcamp. com // 
+358403703659 // skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // 
iMessage: esaru...@gmail.com //



-- 
Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

   

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck  wrote:


> As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for
> thinking differently.
> Now when he is also a Rossi opponent . . .
>

Many people who support cold fusion also oppose Rossi. You do not get to
decide who supports cold fusion.


Unfortunately he (Jed) is rude, opressive . . .
>

Be specific. Who am I oppressing? You? How am I doing this?

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Peter Gluck]

Dear Esa,

Thanks for your care and attention to my problems, but
I am solving them, here it is how: (appended)

As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for
thinking differently.
Now when he is also a Rossi opponent he wants everybody to think as IH says
it is thinking.
Unfortunately he (Jed) is rude, opressive aggressive and irational. But
this was over-discussed.and  enough was told.
Esa, can you tell me why I am trying to get more clicks on my Blog? I am
not publishing ads and at 79 my career is over. I am trying to get LENR
info and to write about subjects relevant for LENR  my choice.

greetings,
peter



On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Esa Ruoho  wrote:

> I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from
> Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably
> knows who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him
> - who they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think
> differently.
>
> On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck
> is playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing
> meee Click here to see how!", then there is no
> actual person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.
>
> The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind
> of wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this
> case, mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is
> nobody stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out
> of thinking like this or that.
>
> So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as
> pointing out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually
> have any enemies out there that he is fighting against.
>
> So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with
> hyperbole in the subjectline.
>
>
>
> On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros 
> wrote:
>
>> Jed
>> You asked;
>>
>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>
>> Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous
>> naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has
>> many appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
>> Thanks for explaining yourself.
>> Kennett Thornros
>> On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Gluck wrote:
>>>
>>> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
>>>
>>>
>>> You brave soul! How admirable.
>>>
>>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //
> +358403703659 //
> skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
> esaru...@gmail.com //
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


RULES OF REAL LIFE PROBLEM SOLVING.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Esa Ruoho]

I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from
Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably
knows who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him
- who they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think
differently.

On the other hand, if this is just a psychological trick that Peter Gluck
is playing, to get some more clicks to his blog, i.e. "They're suppressing
meee Click here to see how!", then there is no
actual person, persons or group of people who he has to fight against.

The whole concept of "fighting for the right to think differently" is kind
of wonky in my honest opinion. In the privacy of your own home (in this
case, mind), you are free to think whatever you want to. There really is
nobody stopping you, there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you out
of thinking like this or that.

So hence Jed's "You brave soul." commentary comes into full focus as
pointing out that Peter, by wanting to think differently, does not actually
have any enemies out there that he is fighting against.

So it's just another blogger trying to survive by posting posts with
hyperbole in the subjectline.



On 12 September 2016 at 14:14, Lennart Thornros 
wrote:

> Jed
> You asked;
>
> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>
> Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous naive
> mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has many
> appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
> Thanks for explaining yourself.
> Kennett Thornros
> On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:
>
>> Peter Gluck wrote:
>>
>> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
>>
>>
>> You brave soul! How admirable.
>>
>> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>


-- 
---
http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659
//
skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
esaru...@gmail.com //

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Lennart Thornros]

Jed
You asked;

Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?

Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous naive
mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has many
appearances sometimes in conflict but true.
Thanks for explaining yourself.
Kennett Thornros
On Sep 11, 2016 19:48, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:

> Peter Gluck wrote:
>
> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
>
>
> You brave soul! How admirable.
>
> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>
> - Jed
>
>

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Axil Axil]

APCO?

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Peter Gluck wrote:
>
> I am fighting for the right to think differently.
>
>
> You brave soul! How admirable.
>
> Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?
>
> - Jed
>
>

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

[Jed Rothwell]

Peter Gluck wrote:

I am fighting for the right to think differently.


You brave soul! How admirable.

Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently?

- Jed