Am 02.09.2011 22:04, schrieb Horace Heffner:
The above makes no sense to me. Resistor wattage ratings are merely
the maximum wattage that can be put though them without the
expectation they will be destroyed. The power ratings are not used to
compute the power or current through them. If
On Sep 2, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I have attached a jpg of the inside of the controller box. Sure is
a rat's nest of wires.
Where did you get that? A screen capture from a video? A still image?
- Jed
Yes. I stopped the
I wrote: It is also notable that if the neutral and ground are
shorted together in the blue box, and the ammeter is clamped on the
neutral, that input power estimates could be double that estimated.
That should read: It is also notable that if the neutral and ground
are shorted together in
Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E
This should be correct because the current IEC 60446 standard is
neutral-blue, line-brown, and protective-earth-green/yellow.
There appears to be some kind of short white adapter between the wall
On Sep 3, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 02.09.2011 22:04, schrieb Horace Heffner:
The above makes no sense to me. Resistor wattage ratings are
merely the maximum wattage that can be put though them without the
expectation they will be destroyed. The power ratings are not
Am 03.09.2011 14:48, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistor
I have had lots of experience burning out resistors. 8^)
I too. Electronics once was my hobby, and still is my day job ;-)
Because I repair, test and develop I have seen burned devices of all
kinds ;-)
On Sep 3, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98EThis should be correct because the current IEC60446 standard is neutral-blue,line-brown, and
Am 03.09.2011 15:23, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Sep 3, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E
This should be correct because the current IEC 60446 standard is
neutral-blue, line-brown, and
On Sep 3, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for all the good information.
There has also been some confusion about the voltage. Sometimes
they say 220V and sometimes 230V.
This is easily explained: In earlier times some countries in europe
used 220V and some used
There is a pretty good photo by Mats Lewan of the band heater and
reactor section here:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
At 04:57 PM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
The total power of resisters (in your drawing) at 300 W + 300 W = 600
W seems low. Rossi states in Krivit's film he is using 748 watts,
from which I did the following computations:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/KrivitFilm.pdf
In another demo the
On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 04:57 PM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
The total power of resisters (in your drawing) at 300 W + 300 W = 600
W seems low. Rossi states in Krivit's film he is using 748 watts,
from which I did the following computations:
The dimmers are commercial ones from an Italian manifacturer. Here the specs
http://www.gsei.it/attachs/P020_01.pdf
In Italian sorry. Try google translator.
2011/9/2 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 04:57 PM 9/1/2011, Horace
It would have been so much better to use a variac or multi-tapped
transformer to vary power. Then a very cheap meter (under $30)
could have been used to monitor both instant power and accumulated
kWh. This could have been done for about $100 per power lead into the
device.
Best
At 01:04 PM 9/2/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
So we have either
9+3 : 9/9 * 300W + 3/9 * R2 = (770W -
65W) giving R2 =
1215W and maximum power at 9+9 is 1515W
3+9 : 3/9 * 300W + 9/9 * R2 = (770W -
65W) giving R2 =
605W and maximum power at 9+9 is 905W
If we could trace the cables then we could
At 01:54 PM 9/2/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
That was just a first-order calculation. I presumed the maximum
wattages are for the same input voltages.
You can do the whole V=IR foo if you want to, but you don't know the
voltages applied to the resistors or the resistor values themselves.
On Sep 2, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 01:54 PM 9/2/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
That was just a first-order calculation. I presumed the maximum
wattages are for the same input voltages.
You can do the whole V=IR foo if you want to, but you don't know
the voltages applied
On Sep 2, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I have attached a jpg of the inside of the controller box. Sure is
a rat's nest of wires.
Where did you get that? A screen capture from a video? A still image?
- Jed
Yes. I stopped the
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 01:04 PM 9/2/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
[snip]
Gee, if choppers are used this creates transients in the input,
and invalidates the use of ordinary current meters or power meters.
The current meters in the experiments were on the
I have to question that order, esp the heater abutting the lead. Also I'm
not entirely convinced there isn't electrical conduction through the water.
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: Vortex-L vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
Horace,
What is unseen remains a matter of conjecture.
T
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
This post is just to check my understanding of the supposed structure of the
Rossi device.
As I understand it, the device elements, in cross section of the
At 09:01 AM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
This post is just to check my understanding of the supposed structure
of the Rossi device.
I think that this (speculative!) diagram best shows the location of
the heating resistors.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3724appendixc8.shtml
On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 09:01 AM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
This post is just to check my understanding of the supposed structure
of the Rossi device.
I think that this (speculative!) diagram best shows the location of
the heating resistors.
23 matches
Mail list logo