Jones, nice conjecture but how do we explain achieving more containment than a
diamond anvil? Does quantum effect also divide down physical containment such
that these magnetic fields won't simply push away the fe oxides and/or geometry
sustaining active sites? Does this theory better support
Fran - The only way Holmlid's claims make sense is that the dense hydrogen
he describes is a more stable phase of hydrogen than metallic hydrogen. This
means it is a phase or isomer which does not require extreme containment.
For instance, we know that alloys with alkali metals will lower the
I just read this article in Space Daily:
http://www.spacedaily.com/m/reports/UMD_discovery_could_enable_portable_particle_accelerators_999.html
It includes some interesting aspects that I could not help wondering if they
are relevant to Holmlid's experiment. But in particular the discussion
Here is the paper
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.02912.
The gas jet is hydrogen, so we could be seeing something similar to Holmlid.
From: Stephen Cooke
I just read this article in Space Daily:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
I just read this article in Space Daily:
>
>
> http://www.spacedaily.com/m/reports/UMD_discovery_could_enable_portable_particle_accelerators_999.html
>
I read the following detail with interest:
We have
5 matches
Mail list logo