RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-16 Thread Roarty, Francis X
rate a long time ago if it were that easy to deal with radioactive waste. From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 8:09 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons Hi Fran, I am unable to imagine how somet

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Bob Higgins
Hi Fran, I am unable to imagine how something special would happen in that case. A muon in slow motion may have a greater chance of interaction if its energy is near the ionization energy of the atoms upon which it is incident - but this is only a small energy - less than 10eV. At higher

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Axil's post is one interpretation of QM, other could be that the QM fields represents real fields e.g. no particles in space. This means that you can view QM as billiard with fields in stead of balls and things get to be much less mystic. Also Mills is starting to get real evidences of over unity

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Axil Axil
We are talking Quantum Mechanics here, not billards. In QM, superposition means that the muon can be in many places at once while it is in the entangled state. Distance does not matter. Where the muon ends up is based on decoherence of what has entangled the muon with the LENR reaction. It is all

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Bob, what if the “muon” doesn’t have to achieve light speed but rather becomes so “suppressed” think traveling thru a tiny Casimir cavity that the muons actual speed inside the cavity where vacuum wavelengths are dilate by suppression appears to achieve negative light speed relative to