On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:38:11AM -0400, Reed Hedges wrote:
> Well, automake works fine for me in general on MinGW whenever I've used
> it there, but never tried it with Visual Studio or Cygwin. Of course
> there's always the incompatible-versions problem with the autotools.
> And maintaining a t
Peter Amstutz wrote:
> Whenever I try to set up a VOS build environment on Windows, I get a
> sharp, throbbing headache and a strong urge to throw my chair out the
> window. It's difficult to understate just how big of a maintainance
> hassle the current build system is on Windows (whether Cygw
Re: [vos-d] bakefiles
At the list from dmoz:
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Operating_Systems/Graphic_Subsystems/Toolkits/
There is no notice about wxWidgets though there is stuffs about GLO GUI
Library (Game GUI Engine), Droplets, General Interface, LGI (Lightweight GUI
Library), and
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:28:41AM -0400, Reed Hedges wrote:
>
> Is it really bad enough to throw out our investment in the autotools
> configuration? bakefile is probably the most obscure of all the build
Whenever I try to set up a VOS build environment on Windows, I get a
sharp, throbbing head
Is it really bad enough to throw out our investment in the autotools
configuration? bakefile is probably the most obscure of all the build
tools you list. If you do switch to bakefile, let's keep some Makefiles
in the bzr tree. And keep bakefile inside the bzr tree so that you don't
have to have
I'm considering switching the VOS s5 build system from automake to
Bakefile (http://bakefile.org). The reason is that the maintainance
overhead imposed by automake has started to get annoying, and that
automake provides no support for building outside the conventional unix
toolchain (for examp
