Re: [vos-d] Re: Terangreal and Unicode?

2005-09-07 Thread Peter Amstutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Reed Hedges wrote: Why use wxConvCurrent instead of wxConvUTF8? I got the impression from the wx docs that wxConvCurrent depends on the (GUI) platform, so on a unicode platform you'd be telling it your strings from VOS were unic

Re: [vos-d] Re: Terangreal and Unicode?

2005-09-06 Thread res
On 07.09.2005 04:08, Reed Hedges wrote: > Why use wxConvCurrent instead of wxConvUTF8? I got the impression from > the wx docs that wxConvCurrent depends on the (GUI) platform, so on a > unicode platform you'd be telling it your strings from VOS were unicode, > when they aren't. I only read the w

Re: [vos-d] Re: Terangreal and Unicode?

2005-09-06 Thread Reed Hedges
Lalo Martins wrote: > And so says Reed Hedges on 05/09/05 09:44... > >>Has anyone else been hacking on Terangreal to build in unicode mode? > > actually, I have (see the thread "can't compile ter'angreal from cvs"). > With help from Peter and a lot of back-bending over wx documentation, > this is