On 07.09.2005 04:08, Reed Hedges wrote: > Why use wxConvCurrent instead of wxConvUTF8? I got the impression from > the wx docs that wxConvCurrent depends on the (GUI) platform, so on a > unicode platform you'd be telling it your strings from VOS were unicode, > when they aren't. I only read the wx docs with a normal depth, no > backwards bending, maybe I am wrong :)
Considering that the converter is used to convert Unicode -> multibyte, wxConvCurrent makes no sense... I interpreted that wxConvCurrent would represent the current singlebyte/multibyte character set of the GUI (e.g. Latin-1 on many western systems). -f.r.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d