Re: [votca] Re: Installation failure on cluster

2019-02-10 Thread Zidan Zhang
Junghans wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:12 PM Zidan Zhang > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Joshua, > > > > Problem solved by adding -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=icc > -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=icpc. > I think the original issue was a combination of

[votca] Re: Installation failure on cluster

2019-02-07 Thread Zidan Zhang
alling the master branch and not > the stable? If there is not a specific feature you need, you might try > cloning the stable branch instead. Also do you know what compiler and > version you are using? > > On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 3:43:04 PM UTC-7, Zidan Zhang wrote: >&

[votca] Re: Installation failure on cluster

2019-02-07 Thread Zidan Zhang
alling the master branch and not > the stable? If there is not a specific feature you need, you might try > cloning the stable branch instead. Also do you know what compiler and > version you are using? > > On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 3:43:04 PM UTC-7, Zidan Zhang wrote: >&

[votca] Installation failure on cluster

2019-02-07 Thread Zidan Zhang
Dear all, I am trying to install the newest version of VOTCA on cluster, the error comes at the make step: Scanning dependencies of target votca_tools_manpages [ 0%] Built target votca_tools_manpages Scanning dependencies of target gitversion Current git revision is f00d0dd [ 0%] Built target

Re: [votca] Re: The nonbonded interactions couldn't converge with implicit solvent model

2016-10-12 Thread Zidan Zhang
can do currently. Thank you and Vitalie for all the help! Best regards, Zidan On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 19:13:49 UTC+2, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > 2016-09-20 2:11 GMT-06:00 Zidan Zhang <zhang...@gmail.com >: > > Dear Christoph, > > Thank you so much for you

[votca] Re: For more than five coarse-grained bead types

2016-09-30 Thread Zidan Zhang
Hi Jang, If it's a two-component system rather than a copolymer system, you can try KB-IBI and C-IBI, the coresponding refs are listed below: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct3000958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4947253 Best, Zidan On Thursday, 29 September 2016 22:46:25 UTC+2, CHANG wrote: > > Dear

[votca] Re: difference between target RDF and new RDF

2016-09-28 Thread Zidan Zhang
I think in the setting.xml file, you should set the value to 0.0. On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:59:43 UTC+2, CHANG wrote: > > Dear Votca Users, > > >Some of new RDFs during IBI do not come to zero at the beginning. Look > at the figure attached. The green curve is the new RDF and the

[votca] Convergence problem of nonbonded interactions

2016-05-08 Thread Zidan Zhang
Dear all, When optimise the nonbonded interactions, some of them don't converge, like shown in the picture. The system is a bulk system and has no crystal. I have tried several solutions: 1. change the scale factor (1.0, 0.7, 0.5); 2. change the initial guess by using high temperature (default

Re: [votca] Does Votca support improper dihedral?

2016-04-10 Thread Zidan Zhang
Dear Christoph, That's the answer I want, thank you so much again. Best regards, Zidan On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:08:43 AM UTC+2, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > 2016-04-09 15:55 GMT-06:00 Zidan Zhang <zhang...@gmail.com >: > > > Dear Christoph > > Thank you so much

Re: [votca] Does Votca support improper dihedral?

2016-04-09 Thread Zidan Zhang
UTC+2, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > 2016-04-09 15:02 GMT-06:00 Zidan Zhang <zhang...@gmail.com >: > > > Dear all, > > As mentioned in the title, does Votca support improper dihedrals in IBI > > method? I have checked the manual, but found no answer. > > Wh

[votca] Does Votca support improper dihedral?

2016-04-09 Thread Zidan Zhang
onded interactions could not be calculated because some atoms involved moved further apart than the multi-body cut-off distance (1.20727 nm) or the two-body cut-off distance (1.5 nm)". But when I ignore the improper dihedrals, everything is OK for the IBI iterations. Thank you very much! Zidan Zhan