On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:43:05PM -0800, Dmitriy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:27:16PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> > >
> > > Want to share your /etc/apt/sources.list ?
> >
> > Okay, here it is:
> >
> > deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main
> > deb-src http://ftp.us.debia
Quoting Issac Trotts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> At one point I wanted an unstable package and so
> apt-get brought a lot of other things with it.
> Being new to all this, I haven't been sure how
> to go back. I'd be interested in knowing if there's
> a clean way to do it, since it doesn't seem to wor
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:27:16PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> >
> > Want to share your /etc/apt/sources.list ?
>
> Okay, here it is:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non
> > Need to get 11.0MB of archives. After unpacking 1301MB will be freed.
> > You are about to do something potentially harmful
> > To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
> >
> > so I think maybe I missed a step...
>
> Hmm, this is very weird. When I set my unstable system wit
> ---ORIGINAL MESSAGE---
> From: "Richard Burkhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [vox-tech] Debian Woody new install - eth0 issues - what am I doing
>wrong?
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:12:33 -0800
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Would you know which debian CDRom
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:38:55PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> > Package: *
> > Pin: release a=stable
> > Pin-Priority: 1001
> >
> >
> > I am not quite sure if security upates in this context are "stable" , or
> > something else, but you can comment it out after you've downgaded.
>
> OK, so I u
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 21:34, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> Sounds like you are lacking any routes.
>
> Does your /etc/network/interfaces file look something like:
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.2
> netmask 255.255.25
Sounds like you are lacking any routes.
Does your /etc/network/interfaces file look something like:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.2
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 07:16 pm, Charles Polisher wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
> > I should think visio can export to some sane format. I'll check at work
> > tomorrow
>
> I seem to remember that Visio will export in Adobe Illustrator
> format, which is ac
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:16:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:54:17PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> > At one point I wanted an unstable package and so
> > apt-get brought a lot of other things with it.
> > Being new to all this, I haven't been sure how
> > to go bac
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:31:08PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> begin Mark K. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > I'd like to replace all the "postscript/blah.pdf" rules with a pattern
> > > rule, but i'm stuck. here's what i tried:
> > >
> > >
You did a lot of work! Thanks!
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 19:16, Charles Polisher wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
> > I should think visio can export to some sane format. I'll check at work
> > tomorrow
>
> I seem to remember that Visio will export in Adobe Illustrator
> format, which is actually PostScript un
Ryan wrote:
> I should think visio can export to some sane format. I'll check at work
> tomorrow
I seem to remember that Visio will export in Adobe Illustrator
format, which is actually PostScript under the hood. It
might be possible to walk Visio's internal data structures in
Ivfhny Onfvp and h
This is on a separate machine ... copy/pastes of log files aren't too easy.
Especially when I can't find a #$()$%*(## blank 3.5 to dump text to.
I'm looking.
> -Original Message-
> > have you used tcpdump yet?
>
> in case you haven't used tcpdump:
Would you know which debian CDRom that
begin Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> begin Richard Burkhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Heyyaz ...
> >
> > Anyone have a bottle of Excedrine TCP/IP? ... (cough, cough) ok, that was a
> > bad one ...
> >
> > I've got a new debian install (on a P200, 64megs ram, 3Com 3C905 NIC,
> > yadda,yad
begin Richard Burkhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Heyyaz ...
>
> Anyone have a bottle of Excedrine TCP/IP? ... (cough, cough) ok, that was a
> bad one ...
>
> I've got a new debian install (on a P200, 64megs ram, 3Com 3C905 NIC,
> yadda,yadda) that I'm installing Woody (w) the 2.4 kernel (have also t
Heyyaz ...
Anyone have a bottle of Excedrine TCP/IP? ... (cough, cough) ok, that was a
bad one ...
I've got a new debian install (on a P200, 64megs ram, 3Com 3C905 NIC,
yadda,yadda) that I'm installing Woody (w) the 2.4 kernel (have also tried
2.2) onto. Everything works all right when installin
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:16:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:54:17PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> > At one point I wanted an unstable package and so
> > apt-get brought a lot of other things with it.
> > Being new to all this, I haven't been sure how
> > to go bac
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:54:17PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote:
> At one point I wanted an unstable package and so
> apt-get brought a lot of other things with it.
> Being new to all this, I haven't been sure how
> to go back. I'd be interested in knowing if there's
> a clean way to do it, since it
At one point I wanted an unstable package and so
apt-get brought a lot of other things with it.
Being new to all this, I haven't been sure how
to go back. I'd be interested in knowing if there's
a clean way to do it, since it doesn't seem to work
to just change the sources back to stable.
Issac
begin Mark K. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> > I'd like to replace all the "postscript/blah.pdf" rules with a pattern
> > rule, but i'm stuck. here's what i tried:
> >
> >%.pdf : %.tex
> > cd postscript; latex $<; dvips -E
> >
> > i'm not su
On second thought...
dvips -E $(shell basename $< .tex).dvi > $(shell basename $@)
would be better. BTW, the latex line I think should be:
latex $(shell basename $<)
but I just work here (tm).
-Mark
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Mark K. Kim wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrot
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> I'd like to replace all the "postscript/blah.pdf" rules with a pattern
> rule, but i'm stuck. here's what i tried:
>
>%.pdf : %.tex
> cd postscript; latex $<; dvips -E
>
> i'm not sure what to put after -E.i'd like to mimic what i have
Here's a makefile i wrote:
DIAGRAMS = postscript/finish.pdf postscript/next.pdf postscript/next3.pdf \
postscript/step.pdf postscript/until.pdf
CHAPTERS := $(wildcard *.tex)
ddd.pdf: $(CHAPTERS) $(DIAGRAMS)
pdflatex ddd.tex
pdflatex ddd.tex
postscript/finish.pdf:
epstopdf (rather than eps2pdf) seems to have solved the problem.
pete
begin p
> hi all,
>
> i'm working on a document that must be processed with pdflatex.
>
> the problem is that i have some diagrams that must be generated with
> postscript specials. they need to be handled separately since
hi all,
i'm working on a document that must be processed with pdflatex.
the problem is that i have some diagrams that must be generated with
postscript specials. they need to be handled separately since pdf files
obviously can't contain postscript directives.
here's my solution:
1. make the di
26 matches
Mail list logo
