[voyager] Re: V3.3 Final Release?

2001-02-09 Thread David Gerber
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:23:45PM +0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: Any target release date for the "Full," non-beta version? Soon (tm). _ Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/ Voyager FAQ:

[voyager] Re: V3.3 Final Release?

2001-02-09 Thread Bob Quintal
Matt Sealey wrote: Any target release date for the "Full," non-beta version? Whensday the Thingytober is Finishedember. Beautiful. However, please note that it does not comply with HTML 4.0 standard date notation. - :-)

[voyager] Re: V3.3 Final Release?

2001-02-09 Thread Gernod Schomberg
Hi Matt (Sealey),(Your message from 09-Feb-01) Hello Patrick On 08-Feb-01, you wrote: Any target release date for the "Full," non-beta version? Whensday the Thingytober is Finishedember. Thanks I remember a post, where someone exaggerated wildly about "peurile babytalk" or similar

[voyager] Re: 3.3.75 Requests/Bugs

2001-02-09 Thread John Nelson
Hi Matt, That's partly because the JS code designed to deal with it is loaded from an external file, which V doesn't support quite yet. Which was one of the first things I noticed when I tried playing with JS. I did this: set var extloadok to 0 load external file - first line sets

[voyager] Re: V3.3 Final Release?

2001-02-09 Thread Bob Quintal
On 09-Feb-01, David Gerber wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:23:45PM +0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: Any target release date for the "Full," non-beta version? Soon (tm). Matt's reply was much more interesting, but yours is preferable.

[voyager] Re: W3 Stats (Was: Crap sites)

2001-02-09 Thread Rob Little
"Samuel Byford" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically the W3 site doesnt decide which html format to check the specs against by the 3.2 or 4.0 or 4.01 part of the DTD - it does it purely on the URL provided (hence: no url - everything errors). You obviously don't know what a DTD *is*. Look it

[voyager] Re: Subdomains

2001-02-09 Thread Matt Sealey
Hello Robin On 09-Feb-01, you wrote: Hallo, I'm not sure if this is ON or OFF Topic :) My domain hoster (Strato) offers now subdomains in an funny way. So called at-domains ... This way you can have subdomains equal to your emails. Ick. for example email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[voyager] Re: Subdomains

2001-02-09 Thread Richard Brooklyn
subdomain: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now I wonder : Is the @ allowed in URL's ? Would this work with V ? Seems it's based a little on JS. I'm just curious ... To my knowleadge (which is very limited!) things like @ etc. are not allowed as part of domian names at all. I think you are

[voyager] Re: Subdomains

2001-02-09 Thread Robin
Hello Uffe subdomain: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now I wonder : Is the @ allowed in URL's ? Would this work with V ? Seems it's based a little on JS. I can't answer the first question, but in contrast to you I have actually taken the time to investigate your second questions. I prepared

[voyager] BUG

2001-02-09 Thread ORHUN KABAKLI
try opening www.amigart.com there are links named Home AboutCompanies News Sites Games They are like menus in Explorer and NetScape I mean when you move your mouse over them they should immediately display a pop up menu. But they don`t. By the way latest beta looks and works much