Hi Matt,
If you're writing strict code, the browser is not the best
place to do code
checking: HTML is very loose in it's definition, as is the
code on the web.
You should run weblint or something over your code - and fix
the important
errors - for instance, a missing /li is no
Hello Ian
On 19-Jul-01, you wrote:
Your mission, though I doubt you'll accept it, is to understand that
users cannot read the minds of the developers, are entitled to hold
opinions different to your own and, if you invite them to comment on
the development, may tell you things you didn't
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20-Jul-01, you wrote:
You should run weblint or something over your code
Like I said further on in my e-mail, 'Note that the use of the strict parser
I describe above is functionality intended for web page development, not
browsing'. I was merely suggesting a
Matt,
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure
their code
is sane ;)
I know, but the web is also a place where many 'amateurs' (as opposed to
professionals) make web pages. They don't use weblint or any other
'development' tools, they're happy if their browser 'shows the
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20-Jul-01, you wrote:
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure
their code is sane ;)
I know, but the web is also a place where many 'amateurs' (as opposed to
professionals) make web pages. They don't use weblint or any other
'development'
In a message of 20-Jul-01 Matt Sealey wrote:
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure their code
is sane ;)
What can I say, most real web developers don't use Voyager at all.
Uffe Holst
_
Voyager
You suck :)
Thanks
--
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for being so friendly ...
W.
_
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Uffe
On 20-Jul-01, you wrote:
In a message of 20-Jul-01 Matt Sealey wrote:
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure their code
is sane ;)
What can I say, most real web developers don't use Voyager at all.
Isn't that what I said? :)
Thanks
--
Matt [EMAIL
In a message of 20-Jul-01 Matt Sealey wrote:
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure their code
is sane ;)
What can I say, most real web developers don't use Voyager at all.
Isn't that what I said? :)
To some extent, yes.
Uffe Holst
--- Reply to a message ---
By: Uffe Holst
-: a Mail
:: [voyager] Re: The num; entity, and all entity support in Voyager - a
:: Dummy's Guide To..
Real web developers use weblint, not Voyager, to make sure their
code is sane ;)
What can I say, most real web developers don't use Voyager at
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 at 20:59:41 Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
V supports every applicable and usable entity defined for the ISO-8859-1
(Latin1) character set.
Snipped explanation of entity support
Of course if any of your team members should be annoyed by this mail,
all reported bugs
On 18-Jul-01, Matt Sealey wrote:
As such, V's entity parser is PERFECT, for all intents and purposes,
for all behaviours of IE, for entities that represent characters
inside the Latin1 codepage. If you really want that to be ABSOLUTELY
true, I will drop support for bull; and beta; today.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 08:02:41AM +, Don Cox wrote:
How about satisfying everyone by having a preferences option to set the
parser for these entities to IE, Strict or Opera ? That would keep
everybody happy, until next time.
This site doesn't werk!
Did you set the prefs to IE ?
And I
Hello Don
On 19-Jul-01, you wrote:
How about satisfying everyone by having a preferences option to set the
parser for these entities to IE, Strict or Opera ? That would keep
everybody happy, until next time.
Don't be stupid, Don.
Of course, that involves a fair bit of coding, but it
Matt,
Hello Don
On 19-Jul-01, you wrote:
How about satisfying everyone by having a preferences
option to set the
parser for these entities to IE, Strict or Opera ?
That would keep
everybody happy, until next time.
Don't be stupid, Don.
Of course, that involves a fair
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19-Jul-01, you wrote:
First off, I agree with you (as formulated in the amusing M:I style
posting), but I do have an answer to your question on why anyone would want
'strict' support: If you're writing pages yourself. If a 'strict' parser is
available that is
Matt Sealey writes...
Your mission - Jools, Ian, Mathias - should you choose to accept it, is to
read this mail, understand that V works just fine, and quit telling me
that it isn't working fine, and that I require looking at it more than I
already have to understand something I've known to
17 matches
Mail list logo
