[voyager] Featurewish: input type=image default border=0

Hi, I would like to propose to change the way Voyager handles input type=image tags. Currently Voyager draws around those input tags by default with a border of one pixel. (border=1) Voyager behaves like old Netscape 4 used to do. Today all web browsers (IE,Safari,Konqueror,Mozilla,Opera,...)

[voyager] bugreport: select attribute size

Hi Voyager ignores the size attribute in select fields. Example: select size=5 multiple option1/option option2/option option3/option option4/option option5/option option6/option option7/option /select The above html should show a select box and it should simultaneously show 5

[voyager] bugreport: bars (nav/link) forget size

Hi, Problem: If you put two navigation bars in the same rows and you resize the window then the bars forget their width. Example: To save some space on the screen I have put the address bar and the list of links in the same row. Both bars have the same width. If I shrink the voyager window

[voyager] bugreport: javascript unable to update img properties

Hi, Problem: Voyager's Javascript seems to be unable to update the width and height attributes of img tags. Javascript slideshow which do alter not only the src but update the width and height as well will fail. Proposel: Please enhance Javascript to allow updates on img properties. Tested

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

Hi, First of all Voyager is nice. Anyway why should be fair and honor where other browser are better. Useless. They have native GIF, JPEG and PNG decoders anyway which are much faster. What's the point of datatypes than to work around the fact that IBrowse isn't PowerPC native yet? Ibrowse

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

Hello everyone, Hello Matt, I just read Matt's last email. Matt, I think you are taking this way to personally. I just wanted to say, if I would have read you last email earlier then I would have not written my comments. For your info: I'm working for MySQL for a living. Well, I personally

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

Hi Matt, Thanks for your answer. Sure, MySQL is a great product! But sometimes some people need Oracle. That's a fact of life. Thats right. MySQL is still a good product even if it misses some features of Oracle. But the same is true for Voyager. Voyager is still a good browser even if other

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

Hi Matt, thanks for the very interesting explanation. :-) Is there a list of reported/known bugs? I would be nice if we could see which bugs are already on the todo list so we don't send them again. For example: I assume the problem, that V does not always honors nbsp;, is already known,

[voyager] still alive?

I did not see any post on this list since halve a year. Is the list dead? -Gunnar

[voyager] Re: still alive?

Is the list dead? mhh . . . dead not . . . in deep coma, yes . . . perhaps ;-) Good to heat that the Voyager list isn't dead yet. :-) But Amtelnet list is dead, isn't it? I tried to send something to Amtelnet but without success. But maybe some of you can help me? The story is that I'm

[voyager] Re: still alive?

Hi Neil, GVB But Amtelnet list is dead, isn't it? I tried to send something to GVB Amtelnet but without success. If you have MiamiDx then MiamiTelnet works quite well. I believe it still only supports SSH1 though. Good idea. While I'm a proud owner of a normal Miami Key I do not have a

[voyager] Re: FW: TSUNAMI; PLEASE SEND THIS TO ALL YOU KNOW.- do you know this little boy? (fwd)

Hi, I've got this email before and I got another email saying that the parents were found by now. But its very nice to see that the voyager list is not dead yet. Is anyone who is working on Voyager still on this list? Cheers Gunnar On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:13 PM, Jools Smyth wrote: On Tue,