Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

Hello, In CSIT we did not observe booting timeouts but in fact our timeout values are not that tight. Peter Mikus Engineer - Software Cisco Systems Limited -Original Message- From: csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez Monroy

[vpp-dev] adding new udp port for udp_register_dst_port interface

Hi, I am trying use the udp_register_dst_port interface with a new entry for UDP_DST_PORT_stream in udp.h. -> foreach_udp4_dst_port as follows: #define foreach_udp4_dst_port \ _ (67, dhcp_to_server) \ ... _ (5001, stream) ... When I build, the binary

[vpp-dev] VPP crashes with "ip probe-neibhbor " for a /31 subnet neighbor

Hi, VPP in the latest builds crashes with the probe-neighbor command for a /31 neighbor. That is, if I have configured 10.2.2.4/31 on an interface and probe 10.2.2.5, VPP crashes at adj_get() because in the ip4_add_del_interface_route function, the neighbor_adj_index is not set for a /31 route

Re: [vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

On 29/05/2017 15:54, Marco Varlese wrote: On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 15:35 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: Hi, I have not seen that behavior before. The dpdk_crypto_sw is only for enabling SW crypto, the default is to support just HW crypto devices. I cannot think of a reason why you would

Re: [vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

Hi, I have not seen that behavior before. The dpdk_crypto_sw is only for enabling SW crypto, the default is to support just HW crypto devices. I cannot think of a reason why you would see that behavior. Basically we just check if we found enough DPDK/Cryptodev HW crypto devices for the

Re: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?

That's how I understand it. Doesn't that mean it should work without the subinterface? Configuring the sub-interface obviously works. I'm just confused about how vpp handles this. For example, I don't need to configure sub-interface for vlan 0 for linux interfaces - the packet doesn't get

[vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

Hi all, I pulled the latest code from master branch last week and I'm seeing something new and related (possibly) to the Cryptodev support in VPP/DPDK. The issue is that it now takes much longer for VPP to initialize... eventually printing out the message: "not enough Cryptodevs, default to

Re: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?

A frame with VLAN 0 means “I’m on the default VLAN” and “here are my PCP bits”. As John suggested, would be good to ry setting a sub-interface for 0. Regards, -Wojciech. From: on behalf of "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"

Re: [vpp-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?

Hi John, UCS-B's drivers apparently send vlan 0 in native vlan. I'm just pointing out that vpp treats vlan id 0 as a vlan when vlan 0 means it's not a vlan (if I understand the IEEE Std 802.1Q correctly). Or am I missing something? Thanks, Juraj From: John Lo (loj) Sent: Thursday, 25 May,