wdec)" <w...@cisco.com>, "fds-...@lists.opnfv.org"
<fds-...@lists.opnfv.org>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?
This patch will force packet with VLAN 0 to be received on the main
sub-inter
t;fds-...@lists.opnfv.org"
<fds-...@lists.opnfv.org>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?
This patch will force packet with VLAN 0 to be received on the main
sub-interface. If the inter
...@cisco.com>
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 10:19
To: "otr...@employees.org" <otr...@employees.org>
Cc: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <w...@cisco.com>, "fds-...@lists.opnfv.org"
<fds-...@lists.opnfv.org>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev
lin...@cisco.com>
Cc: Wojciech Dec (wdec) <w...@cisco.com>; John Lo (loj) <l...@cisco.com>;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; fds-...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?
Juraj,
> That's how I understand it. Doesn't that mean it should work withou
That's how I understand it. Doesn't that mean it should work without the
subinterface?
Configuring the sub-interface obviously works. I'm just confused about how vpp
handles this. For example, I don't need to configure sub-interface for vlan 0
for linux interfaces - the packet doesn't get
A frame with VLAN 0 means “I’m on the default VLAN” and “here are my PCP bits”.
As John suggested, would be good to ry setting a sub-interface for 0.
Regards,
-Wojciech.
From: on behalf of "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes
- PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"