in ip4_header_checksum
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/13803
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Damjan
Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 7:39 PM
To: Dave Barach
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Manual patch verify request: gerrit
Is incremental checksum really needed here,
or we can just move to new vectorized checksum calculation (already used in
ip-input)?
--
Damjan
> On 27 Jul 2018, at 22:17, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> Thanks very much... Dave
>
> From: Tina Tsou mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>>
>
Thanks very much... Dave
From: Tina Tsou
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 1:51 PM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach)
Cc: Brian Brooks ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: Manual patch verify request: gerrit 13769
Dear Dave,
Looking into it...
Thank you,
Tina
On Jul 27, 2018, at 7:23 AM, Dave Barach
patch verify request: gerrit 13769
Folks,
Would it be possible for someone to download and manually verify that
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13769 is functionally correct, and that the proposed
change isn't a performance disaster on aarch64?
Thanks... Dave
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents
Dear Dave,
Looking into it...
Thank you,
Tina
On Jul 27, 2018, at 7:23 AM, Dave Barach (dbarach)
mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Folks,
Would it be possible for someone to download and manually verify that
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13769 is functionally correct, and that the proposed
Folks,
Would it be possible for someone to download and manually verify that
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13769 is functionally correct, and that the proposed
change isn't a performance disaster on aarch64?
Thanks... Dave
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this
