auricio)
> Cc: vpp-dev ; Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Update to iOAM using latest IETF draft #vpp
>
> Mauricio,
>
>> Justin,
>> Do you know the release date for the updated iOAM plugin on the latest
>&
Solis JR, M. (Mauricio)
> Cc: vpp-dev ; Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Update to iOAM using latest IETF draft #vpp
>
> Mauricio,
>
>> Justin,
>> Do you know the release date for the updated iOAM plugin on the latest
>> ietf draft?
-Original Message-
From: Justin Iurman
Sent: maandag 3 augustus 2020 17:11
To: Solis JR, M. (Mauricio)
Cc: vpp-dev ; Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Update to iOAM using latest IETF draft #vpp
Mauricio,
> Justin,
> Do you know the release date for the updated iOAM
Cc: vpp-dev ; Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Update to iOAM using latest IETF draft #vpp
>
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> CC'ing Shwetha, she implemented the IOAM plugin. Last time I checked, IOAM
> namespaces were not included, so it is probably based on the -03 ver
using latest IETF draft #vpp
Hi Mauricio,
CC'ing Shwetha, she implemented the IOAM plugin. Last time I checked, IOAM
namespaces were not included, so it is probably based on the -03 version of
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. Actually, just to let you know, there is already
someone that is going
Hi Mauricio,
CC'ing Shwetha, she implemented the IOAM plugin. Last time I checked, IOAM
namespaces were not included, so it is probably based on the -03 version of
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. Actually, just to let you know, there is already
someone that is going to rebase the implementation on
Hi,
I noticed that the current iOAM plugin implementation is using the first IETF
drafts, so I'm thinking about trying to update the iOAM implementation in VPP
using the latest. I first just want to make sure there that this update is not
in the immediate VPP release pipeline since I do not
