t; *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
>
>
>
> Thank Steven and Alec
>
> I'm using the iperf as a ba
8 at 5:31 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
Fyi
When i launch another image (not based on the clear-linux-kvm) - i'm achieving
good performance (exactly like ovs-dpdk - which is expected in si
gt;
>>
>> Steven
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Sara Gittlin <
>> sara.gitt...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 8:12 AM
>> *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
>&
of Sara Gittlin <
> sara.gitt...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 8:12 AM
> *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor perfo
7 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>"
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
this is the output of:
show vhost-user VirtualEthernet0/0/0
Virtio vhost-use
lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
Hi John and Steven
setting this in the startup config didnt help
vhost-user {
coalesce-frame 0
}
John
I'm u
sts.fd.io> on behalf of Sara Gittlin <
> sara.gitt...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 9:27 AM
> *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
>
>
>
> this is the
compatibility. You are welcome to
keep on using “show err” as it is shorter and faster to type.
Regards,
John
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Sara Gittlin
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:56 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm v
s.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
this is the output of:
show vhost-user VirtualEthernet0/0/0
Virtio vhost-user interfaces
Global:
coalesce frames 32 time 1e-3
number of rx virtqueues in interrupt mode: 0
Interface: Vir
dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Sara Gittlin <sara.gitt...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 6:27 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
this is the output of:
show vhost-user VirtualEth
this is the output of:
show vhost-user VirtualEthernet0/0/0
Virtio vhost-user interfaces
Global:
coalesce frames 32 time 1e-3
number of rx virtqueues in interrupt mode: 0
Interface: VirtualEthernet0/0/0 (ifindex 1)
virtio_net_hdr_sz 12
features mask (0x):
features
i dont think these are error counters - anyway very poor pps
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Sara Gittlin
wrote:
> in the show err output i see that l2-output l2-learn l2-input counters
> are continuously incremented :
> show err
>CountNode
in the show err output i see that l2-output l2-learn l2-input counters
are continuously incremented :
show err
CountNode Reason
11l2-output L2 output packets
11l2-learnL2 learn
Hello
i setup 2 vm connected to VPP as per the guide :
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Use_VPP_to_connect_VMs_Using_Vhost-User_Interface
The performance looks very bad very low pps and large latencies
udp pkt size 100B - throughput 500Mb
average latency is 900us
i have 2 PMDs threads (200% cpu)
14 matches
Mail list logo