Hi Xiaodong,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm studying your link and also searching some other topics & messages. Your
link about host interface is AF_PACKET, right? I searched other posts mentioned
tap has better performance than host interface. Can I use tap for my
requirement?
Dorian
Hi,
The new patch works as expected, no assert triggered abort anymore.
Really appreciate your help and thanks a lot.
Florin Coras 于2023年3月22日周三 11:54写道:
> Hi Zhang,
>
> Awesome! Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> On Mar 21, 2023, at 7:41 PM, Zhang Dongya
> wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
>
> Thanks a
Hello VPP experts,
We have been using VPP for NAT44 for a while, which has worked great.
We contributed some fixes a couple of years ago and have been using VPP
without issues since then.
Now we are considering the possibility of using VPP for a different
usecase as well, related to "broadband
General question, is there any particular reason the probe for interrupt
support is not performed for Intel iAVF driver? The spec indicated support
for interrupts, so I enabled the probe and was able to set the rx-mode
interrupt for this device. I was wondering if this was intentional?
Thanks
Hi Zhang,
Thanks for confirming! Give me a few more days to check if there’s any other
improvements to be made in that area.
Regards,
Florin
> On Mar 23, 2023, at 12:00 AM, Zhang Dongya wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new patch works as expected, no assert triggered abort anymore.
>
> Really
Hi Elias,
You can find such solution in VPP 18.04 where VPP dpdk plugin is modified to
enable HQoS scheduler and shaping function which runs on a separate VPP thread
on TX path. The feature was deprecated in later releases. Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Jasvinder.
> -Original Message-
>
You can run multiple VPP instances [1] and connect them using memif interface,
which is shared memory-based software interface.
VPP also has packet generator, to emulate the PC1, PC2 in your topology.
In this way, you can achieve the topology based on pure software implementation.
[1]