Dave,
A quick solution for that problem is to switch uri.am back to noinst_PROGRAMS.
Still, I’m also curious as to why that fails only for Centos.
HTH,
Florin
> On May 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Dave Wallace wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> The verify job that builds VPP on Centos7 failed on the patch
> h
Tom,
The verify job that builds VPP on Centos7 failed on the patch
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/6672 due to an error installing DPDK:
%<
00:04:23.601 make[2]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
00:04:23.601 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
0
Hi Jon,
On 5/17/17, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
> wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>>
>> No, you are not missing anything, there is a ping missing there indeed...
>> :-)
>>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> OK, *phew*. Not this time then. Good to know!
>
>
>> At the time I cou
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
wrote:
> Jon,
>
> No, you are not missing anything, there is a ping missing there indeed...
> :-)
>
Hi Andrew,
OK, *phew*. Not this time then. Good to know!
> At the time I could not figure out how to get the CONTROL_PING to be
> sent fr
Jon,
No, you are not missing anything, there is a ping missing there indeed... :-)
At the time I could not figure out how to get the CONTROL_PING to be
sent from within the VAT, and since the main use case was
programmatic-API driven (I had used VAT primarily during the initial
debugging/sanity c
Folks,
I have two questions about the ACL plugin's API.
First, when there are no ACLs configured and an ACL_DUMP is requested,
there is no way for the API to reply except to not send a message and let
the "wait for message" time-out and indicate failure. The same problem
exists if one requests A
Hi Xyxue,
I don’t understand what has ‘failed’ here.
The trace shows an echo-reply packet was received, matched against and
outstanding request and punted.
If you are running with multiple worker threads, you’ll need to include;
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6736/
the difference in the FIB output