Re: [vpp-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> Date: Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 14:11 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io>, "honeycomb-...@list

[vpp-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Dear All, I would like to propose the addition of a new API to explicitly create and delete FIB tables. At present the only way to create FIB tables (for e.g. VRFs) is to: 1) Bind an interface to a new table index; ‘set int ip table Eth0 2) Add a route in a new table and set the

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.10

Hi Tim, We don’t have dates planned yet, but typically the release is in the penultimate week of the month. So probably the week of 23rd October. We do plan to integrate DPDK 17.08 into VPP 17.10. Regards, neale From: on behalf of "Steele, Tim"

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue while running VPP inside docker container

Hi Avinash. ‘stuck’ here means running in the foreground without an interactive prompt. If you want a prompt do; ‘vpp unix interactive’ If you want VPP as a background process do; ‘service vpp start’ (if it’s not already running – it usually is after installing the packages). /neale From:

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Hi Chris, Thanks for fixing it! Release notes now available at: https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/release_notes_1707.html regards, neale -Original Message- From: "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> Date: Monday, 31 July 2017 at 18:01 To: "Neale Ranns (nrann

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Release Hi Neale, Thanks for this - great work. Are there release notes archived anywhere? Ray K On 20/07/2017 16:56, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > Dear VPP community, > > The VPP 17.07 release is complete. The release artefacts are n

[vpp-dev] API Change: FIB preference

Dear All, This patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7586/ added a new field to the IP and MPLS route add API to include a path preference. A value of 0 is the default for the preference. Regards, Neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

[vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Dear VPP community, The VPP 17.07 release is complete. The release artefacts are now available on the nexus server. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you all for your continued support for VPP. Best regards, Neale ___ vpp-dev mailing

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.07 release on 19 July

Hello again, If you could also kindly unicast me any feature you would like to see in the 17.07 release notes, that would be most helpful. thanks, neale -Original Message- From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

Original Message- From: "Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <pmi...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, 17 July 2017 at 10:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

12:38:11 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -Original Message- From: "Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <pmi...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, 17 July 2017 at 10:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-d

[vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

Hi All, The error below has occurred 4 times in a row on the verify job for: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7586/ anyone have any insight? Thanks, neale 23:10:32 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk' 23:10:32 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp5.x86_64.rpm

[vpp-dev] VPP 17.07 release on 19 July

Dear All, The VPP release for 17.07 is just two days away. If there are any patches you would like to have committed before we release, please bring them to my attention AYEC. Thanks, neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] show trace bug in vpp stable 1707

Hi Andrew, A couple of things would be useful to help track this down, if you wouldn’t mind. 1. Please run a debug image, then many of those ‘’ will be recovered in the core dump. Then you can (or maybe you can with the image you have) go to frame: #18 0x7732987f in

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

14:15 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: Dharmaray Kundargi <dharmaray.kunda...@mavenir.com>, "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <ksek...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

<ale.silver...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 15:30 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: Dharmaray Kundargi <dharmaray.kunda...@mavenir.com>, "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <ksek...@cisco.com>,

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Yes, and specifically, at the head the mroute has only an accepting interface, at the tail the mroute has only an RPF-ID. /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 10 July 2017 at 05:56 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 18:54 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Hi Neale, Please find the output of "show ip mfib table 1" b

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, If the packets arrive IP on an IP interface, then this is not the use-case for RPF-ID. Show me the mfib route and tell me the ingress interface. /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 11:13 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" &

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, vnet_buffer(b0)->ip.rpf_id is set in mpls_label_disposition_inline. Can you show me the MPLS route at the tail again: ‘sh mpls fib 501’ /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 14:05 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls local-label for a PHP route is not installed correctly..

Hi nagp, It’s a non-EOS route, so you need an imp-null output label. /neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 14:10 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] mpls local-label for a PHP route

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

s, -daw- On 7/6/17 8:22 AM, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: Hello Neale, If I am correct, it is necessary to move/copy vagrant directory from build-root/vagrant/ to extras/vagrant/ in stable/1704 branch. Probably it should be done for all stable vpp branches

Re: [vpp-dev] C Rewrite of vppctl and 1707

Merged. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Ed Warnicke Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 17:06 To: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] C Rewrite of vppctl and 1707 I've pushed https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7446/ to fix the vppctl sudo

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

the stacked DPO chain. But for display purposes, if nothing else, it’s something we should fix. Thanks, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 15:11 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists

[vpp-dev] API CHANGE: in vpp[stable/1707]: DHCP complete event sends mask length

stack. Any dissenting voices please -1. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: "fd.io JJB (Code Review)" <ger...@fd.io> Reply-To: "jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info" <jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info> Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 13:50 To: "Ne

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

Sorry, that should be 17.04… /neale -Original Message- From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 11:56 To: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io> Cc: vpp-dev &

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

, Neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 11:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Thanks for the reply Neale, I se

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today

Dear All, The RC2 label has been placed on this commit. RC2 artefacts are now available in nexus. Regards, neale From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 5 July 2017 at 15:13 To: "Luke, Chris"

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today

ast.com> Date: Wednesday, 5 July 2017 at 14:28 To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today +1 Fairly important, IMO. Chris. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [ma

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Etc…); This is done in fib_path_resolve if the path is flagged as RPF_ID, which yours is not… /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 14:18 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>

Re: [vpp-dev] A query regarding fib_path_ext_init

Hi nagp, My intention there was to ‘pass ownership’ of the label stack to the extension. The caller, the owner of the rpath, should not then free the label stack. This saves the allocation of a new vector and memcpy. Regards, neale From: on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

or more unicast MPLS tunnels in the multicast replication list, then you can create each MPLS tunnel with multiple output labels. Hth, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 13:01 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>

Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS problem

Hi Xyxue, I plan to get it committed into master, and so released in the next cycle; 17.10. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 02:06 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: R

[vpp-dev] Stable Branch for 17.07 pulled

Dear VPP community, Today is RC0 day, hooray ☺ The release branch for the 17.07 branch has now been pulled: stable/1707, and tags laid. From this point forward, up until the release date on July 19th, we need to be disciplined with respect to bugfix commits. Here are a few common-sense

[vpp-dev] FW: API Change: VPP-879 MAP: s/u32 is_add/u8 is_add in map.api

arion.li...@gmail.com" <dmarion.li...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 19 June 2017 at 15:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: Ole Trøan <otr...@employees.org>, "fd.io JJB" <jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info>, Container PoC <ejk

Re: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to work.

Hi Guy, If that’s the full packet trace, then it looks like the packet was dropped by an input feature. Use: sh int feat To see what’s configured. Do you have an IP address configured on the input interface? You’ll need one. If it’s not that, do you have a route for 232.0.0.1 in the

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, VPP does support those scenarios. I’ve not written any documentation sadly, so I’ll write some instructions here… When I wrote the mfib/mpls code I did little testing via the debug CLI, so some of the options below are not be available via the CLI, I’ve put those options is []. I’ll

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp ip6 fib

Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 07:26 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: Minseok Kwon <mxk...@rit.edu>, Shailesh Vajpayee <srv6...@rit.edu> Subject: vpp ip6 fib Hi, Can someone please help me on

Re: [vpp-dev] New vpp node

Hi Alessio, Nothing wrong with your method of compiling/running. Time to break out the debugger; sudo gdb ~/vpp/build-root/build-vpp_debug-native/vpp/bin/vpp (gdb) r -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf (gdb) bt /neale From: on behalf of Alessio Silvestro

Re: [vpp-dev] [SUSPICIOUS] Is this a valid route?

Hi nagp, That’s the correct way to do it. Does 10.1.1.1 in table 0 have out-labels? It needs then in order to be a resolution target for a labelled recursive. Implicit-null is the expected out-label if 10.1.1.1 is directly attached. Regards, Neale From: on

[vpp-dev] VPP API freeze 8th June

Dear All, End of day PST marks the beginning of the VPP API freeze for 17.07. After this time we will not* be accepting patches that change the API (i.e. we will not accept changes to .api files). We do this to provide a moment of calm before the RC0 date to allow external projects a fixed

Re: [vpp-dev] Can we set MPLS exp and ttl fields when programming out labels?

Hi nagp, There’s no means to do that currently, but it would be a welcome addition. Regards, Neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Monday, 5 June 2017 at 08:24 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Can we set

Re: [vpp-dev] Why ip address is mandatory for gre interface?

Hi Wenxian, All interfaces require some IP configuration to become ‘IP enabled’ before they will accept IP traffic. There are 2 ways to IP enable an interface: 1) Add an IP address 2) Make the interface IP unnumbered to another interface that does have an IP address; ‘set int ip

Re: [vpp-dev] question about mfib

Hi Xyxue, To configure a multicast route with multiple replications, one just needs to add the route with multiple paths (like you would for ECMP on a unicast route). For example, do: ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth0 Forward ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth1 Forward ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth2

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

. Saves you managing various patch files. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Friday, 2 June 2017 at 07:20 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Neale, T

Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS problem

Hi Xyxue, Works for me with: DBGvpp# sh ver vpp v17.07-rc0~312-g2062ca5 built by vagrant on localhost at Wed May 31 03:29:47 PDT 2017 configs and setup attached. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 10:08 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" &

Re: [vpp-dev] The count information on virtual interface

MPLS-tunnels are uni-directional, so you’ll never see RX. Regards, Neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 09:45 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] The count informat

Re: [vpp-dev] The count information on virtual interface

Hi Xyxue, MPLS tunnels (and all other tunnels/virtual interfaces) should accumulate stats. Are you seeing no stats when the MPLS tunnel is carrying L2 or L3 traffic? Regards, neale From: on behalf of 薛欣颖 Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 07:28

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

Hi Xyxue, You said there are two scenarios; with MPLS (broken), without MPLS (working). Which scenario is this config for? And can I see the other one too please. Thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 08:10 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" &

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

Hi Xyxue, Can you please give me the full configs in each case. Thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 06:56 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN P

Re: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?

ay 2017 at 19:01 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <jlin...@cisco.com>, "otr...@employees.org" <otr...@employees.org> Cc: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <w...@cisco.com>, &quo

Re: [vpp-dev] [Fds-dev] Does VPP support vlan 0?

Hi Juraj, Please try this: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6936/ which is intended to implement Ole’s suggestion. thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date:

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashes with "ip probe-neibhbor " for a /31 subnet neighbor

HiNagp, Does this work for you? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6918/ /neale From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 09:28 To: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <nagp.li...@gmail.com>, vpp-dev <v

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

will change from CE->CE since the IP TTL decrements. /neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Saturday, 27 May 2017 at 11:07 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi neale, The ping

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

debugging the original problem. I you sure you patched and recompiled the DEBUG version of VPP on both ‘PE’s’? Thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Saturday, 27 May 2017 at 06:33 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io&g

Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS

Hi Xyxue, As you say, probably also: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6883/ thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 12:16 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

;xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 10:26 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi neale, Each of the two VPP is connected to a CE. I'm pinging to and

Re: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?

Yes please ☺ assuming of course mcast_adj_index defaults to ~0 when the radv_info is first created. /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 10:12 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists

Re: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?

Hi nagp, In the latest VPP code adjacency index 0 is valid. In older code this was not the case. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43 To: vpp-dev Subject:

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

Hi Xyxue, So the addresses you are pinging to and from are not owned by the VPPs. Are you issuing the ping command on a VPP or on the device that owns the address.? /neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

oth. Sp we see VPP’s local addresses. Thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 03:26 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Neale， That is the i

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

the other end equipment. Thanks, xyxue From: Neale Ranns (nranns)<mailto:nra...@cisco.com> Date: 2017-05-25 15:00 To: 薛欣颖<mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com>; vpp-dev<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Xyxue, A few things please: 1) A Ch

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

expect the decapped packet to match. Thanks, neale From: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 06:36 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Neale,

Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FIB

Hi Matt, Glad to hear it. And thank you for the patch. Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Matthew Smith <mgsm...@netgate.com> Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 22:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Assert appears when configuring MPLS tunnel

Hi Xyxue, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6837/ regards, neale From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 08:42 To: 薛欣颖 <xy...@fiberhome.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject:

Re: [vpp-dev] Assert appears when configuring MPLS tunnel

Hi Xyxue, Nothing wrong with that config. But there is a bug in VPP. I’ll fix that ASAP. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of 薛欣颖 Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 07:52 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Assert appears when

Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FIB

Hi Matt, No ARP lookup is needed for interfaces that are point-2-point. The FIB will link entries reachable through a p2p interface using a special ‘auto’ adjacency. The auto adj has the all zeros address as a next-hop and a rewrite that is constructed by the interface type (i.e. for GRE has

Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP

s.fd.io>, "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP I sorry to copy the eth2's packet,that is the eth1's packet in vpp1: 00:02:32:132870: af-pa

Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP

t;vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: Failed to ping between two VPP Copying vpp-dev [and Neale Ranns AKA Dr. Fib...] Thanks… Dave From: 薛欣颖 [mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:16 AM

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

sco.com> Date: Monday, 15 May 2017 at 19:45 To: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io> Cc: Ray Kinsella <ray.kinse...@intel.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subjec

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

b > > It happens only with old QEMU emulation (I repro it with “pc-1.0”) which > VIRL uses. > > Fix (revert) is in gerrit: > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6690/ > > Regards, > > Damjan > > >&g

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

n (damarion)" <damar...@cisco.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master Hi Damjan, Once you're patch is merged, is

[vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

From: "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> Date: Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 19:04 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "yug...@telincn.com" <yug...@telincn.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Segmentatio

Re: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in recursivly lookuping fib entry.

Hi Ewan, That’s a bug. I’ll fix it ASAP. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com" Date: Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 03:24 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in recursivly lookuping fib entry. Hi,

Re: [vpp-dev] arp_input

Hi Ewan, You mentioned that these interfaces are ‘bridged to the same host phy interface’ – can you please share the relevant configs for that. Thanks, neale From: "yug...@telincn.com" <yug...@telincn.com> Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:51 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)&quo

Re: [vpp-dev] arp_input

Hi Ewan, Please post your configs and the output of ‘sh ip arp’. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com" Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 12:33 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] arp_input Here are two arp_input

Re: [vpp-dev] Listening to IGMP multicast source address

Hi Guy, There are a few answers to this problem. Can you please give us more details on what you are trying to achieve? An example of the type of packet you want to listen for and what you want to happen to it once it is heard. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] How to destroy a hash?

Hi Nagp, Use hash_free(). The hash_delete() function has been removed from more recent versions. Hth, neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru Date: Monday, 1 May 2017 at 16:47 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] How

Re: [vpp-dev] ping to ip6 uses link local as source..

Hi nagp, I’d suggest a modification to ip6_interface_first_address to indicate whether a link-local is ok. Then you can choose to ignore the link-local when the ping’s destination is global scope. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS encap

Hi Christian, The short answer is you augment an IP route to specify an out-going MPLS label for the path; Ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.1.1 GigE0/0/0/0 out-label 99 For the long answer please consult (which I just this second uploaded):

Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local IPv6 address?

/ please let me know if it fixes your issue. If so I’ll merge. Thanks, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 14:12 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How

Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local IPv6 address?

<nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 18:30 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local IPv6 address? Thanks! One small question - if the

Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local IPv6 address?

data-base serves this purpose*. Regards, Neale *if you are using this in the data-plane though, we should consider alternatives. From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <nagp.li...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 14:04 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-de

Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local IPv6 address?

Hi nagp, If you know the destination address is link local and you know on which interface, then the result of the lookup will result in the adjacency for that link-local address on that interface, i.e. the adjacency you would get back from; adj_index_t ai =

Re: [vpp-dev] fib-walk is consuming 100% CPU..

Hi nagp, A FIB walk that consumes 100% CPU is usually indicative of a cycle/loop in the FIB undirected graph. Cycles in routing should not form permanently, i.e. the routing protocols will eventually converge away from the loop, but they can form temporarily. Use; ‘sh fib walk’ to see the

Re: [vpp-dev] Building router plugin - Mroute

Message- From: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.s...@intel.com> Date: Monday, 3 April 2017 at 23:12 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: 倪红军 <ni_hongj...@163.com>, "Ni, Hongjun" <hongjun...@intel.com>, "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisc

Re: [vpp-dev] Building router plugin - Mroute

at 13:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc: "Ni, Hongjun" <hongjun...@intel.com>, "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>, Ed Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com>, Lukasz Chrustek <ski...@tlen.pl>, "Shaw, Jeffrey B"

Re: [vpp-dev] Out of Tree Build Failure on vnet/rewrite.h

Ed, Is that something we can add to the verify jobs? /neale From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> Date: Friday, 31 March 2017 at 00:15 To: Ed Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subjec

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Missing Network and Broadcast address in FIB for interface IP

Hi Matej, We can add those /32 prefixes to drop packets. /neale From: on behalf of "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 12:24 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc:

Re: [vpp-dev] Features, DPO and their connection

lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damar...@cisco.com>, Kirill Kogan <kirill.ko...@gmail.com> Subject: Features, DPO and their connection Hello, There are two kinds of overla

Re: [vpp-dev] issues when enable proxy-arp

Hi Pan, Could you please collect; sh adj sh adj nbr 5 sh ip fib 192.168.1.1 both before and after the first ping. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of "Pan, Xiao" Date: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 09:00 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] VPP receive no tagged packet on Virtio interface

Hi Matej, Your IP addresses are configured on the same interface; sw_if_index 6. Sw_if_index 5 thus will not accept IP packets. /neale From: on behalf of "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Monday, 6 March

Re: [vpp-dev] problem in classify command in vpp

Hi William, One of those it’s easy if you know what to look for bugs, otherwise a real headache to find. But a one line fix, so I might as well … https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5440/ /neale From: on behalf of William McCall Date: Monday,

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB

day, 20 February 2017 at 11:51 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FI

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB

ry 2017 at 09:41 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit-...@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB Hello Neale, I teste

Re: [vpp-dev] DHCP Proxy for IPv6

Hi Marek, Sure, I’ll add those too. /neale From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <mgrad...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:10 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)&qu

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp patch(es) rebased to master/latest failing PEP8 compliance checks

Hi Dave, Fixed via: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5028/ I have rebased dependent patches. /neale From: on behalf of "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: Sunday, 5 February 2017 at 16:55 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc:

Re: [vpp-dev] How are dpo nodes plugged in the graph?

Hi Nagp, It picks up those next-nodes because it is a sibling of ip4-lookup – by definition siblings share next-nodes. The VLIB code ensures this by tracking sibling relationships and adding a next node to all siblings. Regards, neale From: on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] ppp interface and route dpo

Hi Ewan, An interface class that is defined as point-2-point (P2P) will have an interface route that links to an adjacency and not to a glean. PPP interfaces are configured this way; VNET_HW_INTERFACE_CLASS (ppp_hw_interface_class) = { .name = "PPP", .flags =

Re: [vpp-dev] Plugin for mpls over gre

Hi Calvin, The VPP MPLS code is not specific to any given interface type and so we support MPLS over all interface types that VPP supports. The logical separation is achieved because all MPLS LSPs (and IP routes too) are programmed in terms of next-hops, and any interface can be a next-hop.

<    1   2   3   >