Re: [vpp-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #56625] Nexus fd.io.master.centos7 VPP artifacts

Hello Vanessa, Thank you for an explanation. Indeed this will impact certain things that are planned like "automatic bisecting" (downloading and testing range of artifacts). Let me analyze current situation with CSIT team and get back to you. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - sw_interface_set_flags admin-up link-up failing

, on our local test rig. The error we typically see is "VAT command sw_interface_set_flags sw_if_index 1 admin-up: no JSON data.VAT". Do think it is the same or a separate issue? Ray K On 30/07/2018 08:02, Peter Mikus via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > Hello vpp-dev, > > I am lookin

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - sw_interface_set_flags admin-up link-up failing

l test rig. The error we typically see is "VAT command sw_interface_set_flags sw_if_index 1 admin-up: no JSON data.VAT". Do think it is the same or a separate issue? Ray K On 30/07/2018 08:02, Peter Mikus via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > Hello vpp-dev, > > I am looking for consult

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

Hello, Ø What is the “significant problem” you’re running into? The problem can be better described as: When python is spawning N instances of VPP process, all processes are from unknown reason placed with affinity 0x2 (bin 10). This can be verified by taskset –p . CFS is then placing all

[vpp-dev] CSIT - sw_interface_set_flags admin-up link-up failing

Hello vpp-dev, I am looking for consultation. We started to test VPP for report on all LF CSIT testbeds Skylakes and Haswells. We are observing weird behavior. In each test we are using sequence to first bring the both interfaces (physical up) by VAT: sw_interface_set_flags sw_if_index

Re: [vpp-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #56625] Nexus fd.io.master.centos7 VPP artifacts

Hello, We are creating branches on weekly basis and CSIT being verified in weekly job. So the question is if there is option to set "date" or "number" when limiting repo. Counting the cadence of up to 10 merges per day (artifacts posted on Nexus) then means that safe value is around 100-120

[vpp-dev] CSIT rls1807 report - draft out

CSIT rls1807 draft report is out: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1807/report/index.html Pls give it a scan and send feedback to csit-...@lists.fd.io. We're still waiting for few tests to finish: vpp-ligato, more MLR/MRR performance tests. Expecting these to be

Re: [vpp-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #56625] Nexus fd.io.master.centos7 VPP artifacts

Hello Vanessa, For CSIT it is not about release or not. We would need to increase cadence on our weekly jobs to daily. Currently CSIT jobs are all failing as VPP has more than 10-15 artifacts in week. Our defined stable versions of VPP (updated once a week) are not in repo anymore or are

[vpp-dev] CSIT-VPP srv6 jumbo frames not working.

Hello During testing we have hit an issue with our SRv6 tests and with Jumbo packets of size 9000B. Currently all 9K tests are not passing. It is not clear as of now when it was the first time this issue appear as 9K tests are not frequently run. 78/1518B tests are passing with no issue.

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT-VPP srv6 jumbo frames not working.

Hello, Our interfaces (sh hard) are able to handle MUT 9202B. Most probably you are referring to this output: Name IdxState MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS) Counter Count TenGigabitEtherneta/0/0 1 up 9000/0/0/0 rx packets

[vpp-dev] vpp_api_test missing after vpp installation

Hello vpp-dev, In CSIT we are facing the issue with missing "vpp_api_test" binary located in "/usr/bin" after *deb packages are installed in system. testuser@s14-t32-sut1:/ $ sudo find / -name vpp_api_test testuser@s14-t32-sut1:/ $ testuser@s14-t32-sut1:/ $ ll /usr/bin/vpp* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root

[vpp-dev] CSIT - VirtualEthernet interface UP issue

Hello vpp-dev, Recently we are facing issue that VirtualEthernet interfaces (vhost-user) are not coming UP once we put them to admin UP state. Brief bisecting reveals that its happening after one of these: git log --pretty=oneline 0a4e006..5507192 5507192339aed14634929b3e8d7c5d3e5ea8f997 Fix

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] [csit-dev] VPP 18.10 is out!!!

Hello, Please address all the question to vpp-dev. It is not tested by CSIT anymore. Thanks. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: csit-...@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Florin Coras Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:43 AM To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing

Peter Mikus via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:27 AM To: Nicolau, Radu mailto:radu.nico...@intel.com>> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing Peter Mikus Engineer - Software Cisco Systems Limi

Re: [vpp-dev] VAT api changes 5507192..8807674

TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: csit-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VAT api changes 5507192..8807674 Is it still broken? -Maciek On 3 Oct 2018, at 09:11, Peter Mikus via Lists.Fd.Io mailto:pmikus=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote: Hello devs, Recently in CSIT we are facing the

[vpp-dev] VAT api changes 5507192..8807674

Hello devs, Recently in CSIT we are facing the issue with vpp_api_test console with JSON enabled, when calling dump_interface_table: dump_interface_table:6017: JSON output supported only for VPE API calls and dump_stats_table main:427: BUG: message reply spin-wait timeout our API call: $

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing

Peter Mikus Engineer - Software Cisco Systems Limited From: Nicolau, Radu Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 8:38 PM To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Cc: Kinsella, Ray Subject: RE: CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing Hi Peter, I'm traveling this week so I won't

[vpp-dev] CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing

Hello devs, We are observing IPSec failing tests in CSIT-perf, specially and only combination with aes-gcm (both interface AND tunnel mode, Integ Alg AES GCM 128). Note: Integ Alg SHA1 96, is working. Can you please help decrypt the error message below? Thank you. VAT error message (on both

[vpp-dev] CSIT-1282 Migrate from Nexus.fd.io to packagecloud.io

Hello community, As of this week and CSIT merged patch [0], we are downloading artifacts directly from packagecloud.io [1] instead of nexus.fd.io. This move was discussed on CSIT public call on Wed-13. As there is some dependency on other commits (specially new bootstrap design) this change

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins.fd.io network issues

Hello, This issue is starting to be very serious and impacting deliverables for CSIT project. Can you please investigate with priority. Subset of failed jobs (just few examples from past days): https://jenkins.fd.io/job/csit-vpp-perf-verify-1904-2n-skx/38/

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGABRT during dpdk_config

Hello, Would be helpful if you can describe your environment closer. K8S version, yaml, etc. This seems to be problem of mapping hugepages. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

Latest update is that Benoit has no access over VPN so he did try to replicate in local lab (assuming x86). I will do quick fix in CSIT. I will disable MLX driver on Taishan. Peter Mikus Engineer - Software Cisco Systems Limited > -Original Message- > From: Juraj Linkeš > Sent:

Re: [vpp-dev] Requirements for DPDK pmd/feature testing in CSIT vpp-device-test jobs

Hello, Q: > Where does the vpp-device-test live? (For VPP) It lives in [0] and runs per-patch non-voting. Plan is to move it to voting as coverage and stability issues are now limit close to zero (except major Jenkins outages which we are not in control) and all the results were analyzed for

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

+dev lists Peter Mikus Engineer - Software Cisco Systems Limited > -Original Message- > From: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 11:06 AM > To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Juraj Linkeš > ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > > Cc: Vratko

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] current verify issues and jenkins build queue

1device restored. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited > -Original Message- > From: csit-...@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Ed Kern > via Lists.Fd.Io > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:58 PM > To: vpp-dev ; csit-...@lists.fd.io > Cc: csit-...@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] crypto_ia32 -> crypto_native

Let us know the commit id and when it will be merged. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: csit-...@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 9:54 PM To: vpp-dev ; csit-...@lists.fd.io Cc: csit-...@lists.fd.io Subject:

[vpp-dev] CSIT - VM VHOST tests with qemu mrg_rxbuf=off [VPP-1854]

Hello vpp-dev, We found issues running CSIT VM VHOST tests. I opened VPP-1854 for tracking. In case of any questions please contact @csit-dev. Thank you. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

[vpp-dev] CSIT - VM VHOST tests with rxq>1 failing [VPP-1853]

Hello vpp-dev, We found issues running CSIT VM VHOST tests. I opened VPP-1853 for tracking. In case of any questions please contact @csit-dev. Thank you. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

[vpp-dev] CSIT - AVF interface create crash [VPP-1858]

Hello vpp-dev, We found issues running CSIT AVF tests. I opened VPP-1858 for tracking. In case of any questions please contact @csit-dev. Thank you. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply

Re: [vpp-dev] csit verify failures

Hello, I am now fully allocated to monitor the issue and find most appropriate solution as long term fix. There were few issues identified. 1) Race condition on Intel x700 series card being tracked in separate mail ([csit-dev] [vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing) and being solved with

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] csit verify failures

From: csit-...@lists.fd.io on behalf of Peter Mikus via lists.fd.io Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 17:27 To: csit-...@lists.fd.io; Benoit Ganne (bganne) Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [csit-dev] csit verify failures Hello, I am now fully allocated to monitor

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] csit verify failures

From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Peter Mikus via lists.fd.io Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 18:08 To: csit-...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] csit verify failures Hello, Status update: Today I have found one of the resource bottleneck being csit-shim container

Re: [vpp-dev] RFC: Enabling Gerrit Auto-Abandon job on VPP master

@Ole, > What do you intend to happen with those 600+ abandonded changes in the future? Clicking in gerrit on "restore" button, if you find a gold in there ;) Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

vpp_device, a.k.a functional per patch testing in volume. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: Damjan Marion (damarion) Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 14:02 To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) Cc: Juraj

Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

This effectively means to me decommission of vpp_device testing on Fortville, due to absent of support (API, switch, whatever...). Vlan is fundamental feature of isolating the traffic into VFs in multitenant environments. It is clear from [0] //quote If you have applications that require