Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

+1 On 8/9/2017 1:49 PM, Luke, Chris wrote: Yeah, I suspect the API was simple enough back at the beginning that it just made sense to do it that way. This message, and presumably others, suffer from legacy cruft. Assuming the downstream consumers are okay with it, I fully support blowing out

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Yeah, I suspect the API was simple enough back at the beginning that it just made sense to do it that way. This message, and presumably others, suffer from legacy cruft. Assuming the downstream consumers are okay with it, I fully support blowing out the cruft. Chris. > -Original

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi Chris, I don’t know the history. Convenience probably. In the absence of our attempt at auto-generating/auto-detecting event-notify pairs, the message re-use is understandable. I’m just trying to avoid the special cases in those generators (like-wise with the recent ACL dump addition).

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, Any objections or support for this proposal? Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 16:02 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" ,