Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-15 Thread Dave Wallace 

Hi Jim,

Thank you for letting us know and volunteering to maintain the rpm builds.

I'm certainly willing to help, but have limited experience with rpms.

Also, please let us know if/when you transition to another OS and any 
other CI needs.


Thanks,
-daw-

On 12/14/2020 8:33 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:


We currently use CentOS.  If that means we have to maintain this, so 
be it.


Jim

On Dec 14, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Paul Vinciguerra 
 wrote:



Hi Damjen,

Thanks for approving my change.

Hi Dave,

That was what I wanted to understand.  I think some folks here may 
use rpm's.  If they don't want to take over the responsibility of 
maintaining the spec, I'm +1 for removing the rpm build and saving 
the resources on the CI.


I just know that it means that the docs and vpp_config would have to 
be updated, but I don't know what else.


Paul

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Wallace > wrote:


I agree with Damjan.  It was orphaned by the RedHat folks who
left the project a long time ago.
I'd recommend removing centos support sooner rather than later as
it is simply wasting energy at this point.

Thanks,
-daw-

On 12/14/2020 1:57 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:

Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself?

Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end
of 2021, yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to
supporting Centos 7 or should we plan to drop the process of
building rpms before Centos 8 ends support?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion mailto:dmar...@me.com>> wrote:


AFAIK it is unwanted child….


—
Damjan



On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra
mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>> wrote:

Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers
file.

https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408

fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package. 
I'd bet that it probably breaks something that we're not
testing, though.














-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18343): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18343
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Jim Thompson via lists.fd.io 

We currently use CentOS.  If that means we have to maintain this, so be it. 

Jim 

> On Dec 14, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Paul Vinciguerra  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Damjen,
> 
> Thanks for approving my change.
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> That was what I wanted to understand.  I think some folks here may use rpm's. 
>  If they don't want to take over the responsibility of maintaining the spec, 
> I'm +1 for removing the rpm build and saving the resources on the CI.
> 
> I just know that it means that the docs and vpp_config would have to be 
> updated, but I don't know what else.
> 
> Paul
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Wallace  wrote:
>> I agree with Damjan.  It was orphaned by the RedHat folks who left the 
>> project a long time ago.
>> I'd recommend removing centos support sooner rather than later as it is 
>> simply wasting energy at this point.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -daw-
>> 
>> On 12/14/2020 1:57 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
>>> Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself?
>>> 
>>> Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end of 2021, 
>>> yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to supporting Centos 7 or 
>>> should we plan to drop the process of building rpms before Centos 8 ends 
>>> support?   
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion  wrote:
 
 AFAIK it is unwanted child….
 
 
 — 
 Damjan
 
 
> On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra  
> wrote:
> 
> Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file. 
> 
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408 
> fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd bet that 
> it probably breaks something that we're not testing, though. 
> 
> 
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18338): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18338
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Paul Vinciguerra 
Hi Damjen,

Thanks for approving my change.

Hi Dave,

That was what I wanted to understand.  I think some folks here may use
rpm's.  If they don't want to take over the responsibility of maintaining
the spec, I'm +1 for removing the rpm build and saving the resources on the
CI.

I just know that it means that the docs and vpp_config would have to be
updated, but I don't know what else.

Paul

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Wallace  wrote:

> I agree with Damjan.  It was orphaned by the RedHat folks who left the
> project a long time ago.
> I'd recommend removing centos support sooner rather than later as it is
> simply wasting energy at this point.
>
> Thanks,
> -daw-
>
> On 12/14/2020 1:57 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
>
> Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself?
>
> Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end of 2021,
> yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to supporting Centos 7 or
> should we plan to drop the process of building rpms before Centos 8 ends
> support?
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion  wrote:
>
>>
>> AFAIK it is unwanted child….
>>
>>
>> —
>> Damjan
>>
>>
>> On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file.
>>
>> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408
>> fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd bet that
>> it probably breaks something that we're not testing, though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
>
>
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18337): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18337
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Dave Wallace 
I agree with Damjan.  It was orphaned by the RedHat folks who left the 
project a long time ago.
I'd recommend removing centos support sooner rather than later as it is 
simply wasting energy at this point.


Thanks,
-daw-

On 12/14/2020 1:57 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:

Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself?

Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end of 
2021, yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to supporting 
Centos 7 or should we plan to drop the process of building rpms before 
Centos 8 ends support?


On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion > wrote:



AFAIK it is unwanted child….


—
Damjan



On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra
mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>>
wrote:

Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file.

https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408

fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd
bet that it probably breaks something that we're not
testing, though.











-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18336): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18336
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Paul Vinciguerra 
Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself?

Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end of 2021,
yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to supporting Centos 7 or
should we plan to drop the process of building rpms before Centos 8 ends
support?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion  wrote:

>
> AFAIK it is unwanted child….
>
>
> —
> Damjan
>
>
> On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra 
> wrote:
>
> Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file.
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408
> fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd bet that it
> probably breaks something that we're not testing, though.
>
> 
>
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18334): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18334
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io 

AFAIK it is unwanted child….


— 
Damjan


> On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra  wrote:
> 
> Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file. 
> 
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408  
> fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd bet that it 
> probably breaks something that we're not testing, though. 
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18333): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18333
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-14 Thread Paul Vinciguerra 
Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file.

https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408
fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package.  I'd bet that it
probably breaks something that we're not testing, though.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18332): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18332
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-