Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
ok, i wasn't aware that vlan sub interface support is advertised from 1710 release. even though merge to 1707 was a preference, we are ok either way. we can use it as a patch for now, till we move to 1710 builds Regards, Prabhjot - Original Message - From: "Luke Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> To:"prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com>, "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com> Cc:"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Sent:Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:01:41 + Subject:RE: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces Eeh, we haven't previously advertised support for VLAN tags on af_packet before; I could believe it was a missing feature, but I have a harder time accepting it was a bug. I'm not strongly against the merge (though I do have a preference for strongly encouraging people to keep up with releases at this time), but I do want us to be clear about the disposition of this change. Chris. > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of prabh...@techtrueup.com > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 11:43 > To: Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > well looking at the change it definitely suggests to be a bug fix. > > we are currently using 1707 builds, and dont have plan to move to newer > release right now, so would prefer a merge to 1707. > > Regards, > Prabhjot > > Quoting "Neale Ranns (nranns)" > <nra...@cisco.com>: > > > With my release manager hat on … > > Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug > > fix (to be back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10 > > onwards)? > > > > /neale > > > > -Original Message- > > From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com> > > Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07 > > To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> > > Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)" > > <l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya > > Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself. > > > > Regards, > > Prabhjot > > > > Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>: > > > > > See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily > > > to stable/1707. > > > > > > Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves > > > your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager] > > > whether to merge it or not. > > > > > > Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you. > > > > > > Thanks… Dave > > > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > > > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi > > > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM > > > To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi > > > <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj) > > > <l...@cisco.com> > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > > > yes it works perfectly fine with this patch. > > > i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. > > > > > > Thanks for the help :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Prabhjot > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > "Akshaya Nadahalli" > <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>> > > > > > > To: > > > "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" > > > <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>, > > > <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo" > > > <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> > > > Cc: > > > > > > Sent: > > > Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 > > > Subject: > > > Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > > > > > > Hi Prabhjot, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: > > > > > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > &
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
Eeh, we haven't previously advertised support for VLAN tags on af_packet before; I could believe it was a missing feature, but I have a harder time accepting it was a bug. I'm not strongly against the merge (though I do have a preference for strongly encouraging people to keep up with releases at this time), but I do want us to be clear about the disposition of this change. Chris. > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of prabh...@techtrueup.com > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 11:43 > To: Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > well looking at the change it definitely suggests to be a bug fix. > > we are currently using 1707 builds, and dont have plan to move to newer > release right now, so would prefer a merge to 1707. > > Regards, > Prabhjot > > Quoting "Neale Ranns (nranns)" > <nra...@cisco.com>: > > > With my release manager hat on … > > Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug > > fix (to be back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10 > > onwards)? > > > > /neale > > > > -Original Message- > > From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com> > > Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07 > > To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> > > Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)" > > <l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya > > Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself. > > > > Regards, > > Prabhjot > > > > Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>: > > > > > See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily > > > to stable/1707. > > > > > > Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves > > > your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager] > > > whether to merge it or not. > > > > > > Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you. > > > > > > Thanks… Dave > > > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > > > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi > > > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM > > > To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi > > > <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj) > > > <l...@cisco.com> > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > > > yes it works perfectly fine with this patch. > > > i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. > > > > > > Thanks for the help :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Prabhjot > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > "Akshaya Nadahalli" > <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>> > > > > > > To: > > > "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" > > > <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>, > > > <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo" > > > <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> > > > Cc: > > > > > > Sent: > > > Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 > > > Subject: > > > Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > > > > > > > Hi Prabhjot, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: > > > > > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Akshaya N > > > > > > On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: > > > trying again with more appropriate subject > > > > > > Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? > > > > > > As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface > > > host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) > > > host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is > > > associated to bridge domain 3 > > > when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it > > > to bd 2 and not bd 3 > > > > > > Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops > > > the packet with some error. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Prabhjot > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Akshaya N > > > ___ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
well looking at the change it definitely suggests to be a bug fix.
we are currently using 1707 builds, and dont have plan to move to
newer release right now, so would prefer a merge to 1707.
Regards,
Prabhjot
Quoting "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
<nra...@cisco.com>:
With my release manager hat on …
Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug
fix (to be back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10
onwards)?
/neale
-Original Message-
From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com>
Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)"
<l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>,
Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself.
Regards,
Prabhjot
Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>:
> See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily
> to stable/1707.
>
> Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves
> your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager]
> whether to merge it or not.
>
> Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you.
>
> Thanks… Dave
>
> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM
> To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi
> <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj)
> <l...@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
>
> yes it works perfectly fine with this patch.
> i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well.
>
> Thanks for the help :)
>
> Regards,
> Prabhjot
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>>
>
> To:
> "Prabhjot Singh Sethi"
> <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>,
> <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo"
> <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>>
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530
> Subject:
> Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
>
>
> Hi Prabhjot,
>
>
>
> Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps:
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Akshaya N
>
> On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote:
> trying again with more appropriate subject
>
> Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ?
>
> As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface
> host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10)
> host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is
> associated to bridge domain 3
> when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it
> to bd 2 and not bd 3
>
> Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops
> the packet with some error.
>
> Regards,
> Prabhjot
>
>
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
> --
> Regards,
> Akshaya N
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
With my release manager hat on … Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug fix (to be back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10 onwards)? /neale -Original Message- From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com> Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07 To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)" <l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself. Regards, Prabhjot Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>: > See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily > to stable/1707. > > Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves > your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager] > whether to merge it or not. > > Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you. > > Thanks… Dave > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM > To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi > <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj) > <l...@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > yes it works perfectly fine with this patch. > i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. > > Thanks for the help :) > > Regards, > Prabhjot > > - Original Message - > From: > "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>> > > To: > "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" > <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>, > <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo" > <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> > Cc: > > Sent: > Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 > Subject: > Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces > > > Hi Prabhjot, > > > > Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ > > > > Regards, > > Akshaya N > > On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: > trying again with more appropriate subject > > Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? > > As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface > host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) > host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is > associated to bridge domain 3 > when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it > to bd 2 and not bd 3 > > Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops > the packet with some error. > > Regards, > Prabhjot > > > ___ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > -- > Regards, > Akshaya N ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself. Regards, Prabhjot Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>: See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily to stable/1707. Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager] whether to merge it or not. Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you. Thanks… Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj) <l...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces yes it works perfectly fine with this patch. i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. Thanks for the help :) Regards, Prabhjot - Original Message - From: "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>> To: "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>, <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo" <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> Cc: Sent: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces Hi Prabhjot, Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ Regards, Akshaya N On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: trying again with more appropriate subject Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is associated to bridge domain 3 when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it to bd 2 and not bd 3 Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops the packet with some error. Regards, Prabhjot ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- Regards, Akshaya N ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily to stable/1707. Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager] whether to merge it or not. Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you. Thanks… Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj) <l...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces yes it works perfectly fine with this patch. i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. Thanks for the help :) Regards, Prabhjot - Original Message - From: "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>> To: "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>, <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo" <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> Cc: Sent: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces Hi Prabhjot, Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ Regards, Akshaya N On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: trying again with more appropriate subject Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is associated to bridge domain 3 when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it to bd 2 and not bd 3 Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops the packet with some error. Regards, Prabhjot ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- Regards, Akshaya N ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
yes it works perfectly fine with this patch.i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well. Thanks for the help :) Regards, Prabhjot - Original Message - From: "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com> To: "Prabhjot Singh Sethi" <prabh...@techtrueup.com>, <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "John Lo" <l...@cisco.com> Cc: Sent: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530 Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces Hi Prabhjot, Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ [1] Regards, Akshaya N On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: trying again with more appropriate subject Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is associated to bridge domain 3 when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it to bd 2 and not bd 3 Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops the packet with some error. Regards, Prabhjot ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [2] https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev [3] -- Regards, Akshaya N Links: -- [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ [2] mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [3] https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
Hi Prabhjot, Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/ Regards, Akshaya N On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote: trying again with more appropriate subject Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is associated to bridge domain 3 when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it to bd 2 and not bd 3 Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops the packet with some error. Regards, Prabhjot ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- Regards, Akshaya N ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
trying again with more appropriate subject Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ? As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10) host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is associated to bridge domain 3 when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it to bd 2 and not bd 3 Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops the packet with some error. Regards, Prabhjot ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
