Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Tell me please, how many MPLS-labels on the stack supports VPP? 07.08.2017, 07:25, "Kinsella, Ray" : > Thanks ! > > On 31/07/2017 13:51, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: >>  Hi Chris, >> >>  Thanks for fixing it! >>  Release notes now available at: >>    https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/release_notes_1707.

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

In general, there is no limit to the number of MPLS labels. If you can be more specific about what you are referring to (i.e. how many labels can be pushed per LSP, or how many MPLS lookups/pops per packet) then I can give you a more definitive answer. /neale -Original Message- From:

[vpp-dev] test command

Hi， Can these two commands(test http server 、 test tcp server) be configured together? When I configure the two commands at the same time, there is a multiple registrations shown below： DBGvpp# test tcp server DBGvpp# test http server 0: vl_msg_api_config:682: BUG: multiple registrations of

Re: [vpp-dev] 回复: vpp cpu usage utility

Hi Dave, Thanks for your inputs.. I just experimenting based on your inputs.. when i push < 7Gbps i don't see any packet losses on dpdk side and the vector/call is still ~1.1. As you mentioned <2.0,means has lot of room left.. then i just increased the traffic to achieve bit rate of about 8gbps to

Re: [vpp-dev] query on L2 ACL for VLANs

Hi John, ACL feature is working after setting IP address on the sub-interface. Thanks for help Regards, Balaji On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:24 PM, John Lo (loj) wrote: > Hi Balaj > > > > I think the problem is that you did not configure an IP address on the > sub-interface. Thus, IP4 forwarding i

Re: [vpp-dev] query on L2 ACL for VLANs

Hi John, Thanks for quick response. I tried as you suggested to associate input ACL on IP-forwarding path for tagged packets. Ingress packets are not hitting ACL node and are dropped. However ACL with src/dst IP, MAC address, udp port numbers are fine. *Following are the configuration steps follo

[vpp-dev] user space TCP stack

​Hi, I trying to use mTCP in my application but it is very primitive, for example it permits only one epoll instance and does not have shutdown API equivalent. Does VPP support user space TCP stack similar to mTCP? if so where is a sample application using it? Thanks, hamid ___

Re: [vpp-dev] test command

These are test codes. No warranty, express or implied. It would take a few minutes to unify the two API message handlers, but at some point in the near future, I’m going to clean up the API client registration nonsense involved. As you might imagine, it’s easy to make direct calls from within vp

[vpp-dev] MEMIF Throuput Problem

Hi , I am insterested in connecting two instance of vpp by memif (one vpp is running in host and another vpp is running in a lxc container). I have achieved functionality goal by memif but I have problem in performance test. I have done the following steps respectively: 1. first of all I installed

Re: [vpp-dev] MEMIF Throuput Problem

You are passing each packet twice trough hostvpp so effectivelly your hostvpp performance is 8 Mpps per core. There are several factors which can impact performance (cpu speed, numa locality, memory channel utilisation) but still you cannot expect order of magnitude better numbers. Best performan

[vpp-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, I would like to propose the addition of a dedicated SW interface event message type rather than overload the set flags request. The over-loading of types causes problems for the automatic API generation tools. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7925/ regards, neale _

Re: [vpp-dev] user space TCP stack

Hi Hamid, Yes, we do have a userspace TCP stack but it is still under development. You can find examples of external apps here [1] and internal apps here [2, 3]. All of these use the binary api to interact with the session layer code. We’ll soon publish a wrapper library that should make inte

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Hi All, In the absence of any objections I have done: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7819/ I’ll have a crack at the necessary CSIT changes. Is this: https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/Tutorials/Vagrant/Virtualbox/Ubuntu still the recommended way to test CSIT code changes? Thanks, neale From: Dave Wa

[vpp-dev] FW: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-vpp]networking-vpp 17.07.1 for VPP 17.07 is available

Dear FD.io-ers, I know some of you may have missed this announce on openstack mailing list. Regards, Jerome De : Ian Wells Répondre à : "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date : lundi 31 juillet 2017 à 01:07 À : OpenStack Development Mailing List Objet : [openstack-