Hi,
I am using vpp v18.01-rc0~160-ge13c799 (show version in vppctl). I feel
I find a bug.
I have two physical interfaces TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 (int1)
and TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1 (int2).
Normally, if I send traffic (from another server) to int1, I expect int2
should NOT receive the traffic.
Hi guys,
I am using vpp v18.01-rc0~241-g4c9f2a8.
I configured 200K static routing. When I 'show memory' in VPP, '150+k used'.
But in my machine ,used almost 15g. After del the static routing ,almost using
16g memory.
More info is shown below:
VPP# show memory
Thread 0 vpp_main
heap
Hi all,
Recently, I want to build a new plugin for my work. I follow the guild
here:
https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/sample_plugin_doc.html
How to create a new plugin
To create a new plugin based on the sample plugin, copy and rename the sample
plugin directory and automake config.
cp
Are you implementing a new graph node, which consumes UDP traffic? If so, then
the BFD example is a way to redirect interesting traffic to your new node...
> -Original Message-
> From: lin huang [mailto:mit...@outlook.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 9:16 AM
> To: Klement Sekera -X
Hi Lin Huang,
You can take a look at bfd_udp_init() in bfd_udp.c to see how the BFD feature
registers to listen on BFD ports using udp_register_dst_port().
Thanks,
Klement
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
> Behalf Of lin
Hi Klement,
I want to redirect data to a new udp port. Do I need to modify VPP code?
Adding a new UDP_DST_PORT_ enum types??
Thanks a lot!!!
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>>[mailto:ksek...@cisco.com]
>>Sent: Monday,
From: lin huang
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 2:53 PM
To: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
Subject: how to redirect specific UDP port data to a new node?
Hi, all.
I want to know how to redirect specific UDP port data to a new node?
Dose udp_register_dst_port make effecet? Or using the arc
Hi Holoo,
Can I recommend that you play at bit with VPP's packet tracing facility.
The following wiki page explains setting up the tracer a bit.
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interface_To_VPP#Show_trace
You will see from tracing a that FD.io VPP exists independently of the
Thanks Neale for your time. as a followup i will try following.
- setting MAC address on Physical interface
- following up with expected configuration on firewall to rule out
strict requirements on source MAC.
Regards,
Prabhjot
- Original Message -
From:
"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Hi Prabhjot,
If there is only one link between VPP A and B, regardless of the number of .1q
sub-interfaces, the forward and reverse direction packets *should* have the
same MAC addresses.
You mention ECMP. Is the reverse direction traffic arriving on the same
interface from which it was
Hi Neale,
we have the traffic working however the packets looks like
source 1.1.1.3 (02:00:00:00:00:01) dest 2.2.2.3 (02:00:00:00:00:02)
however for reverse traffic
source 2.2.2.3 (02:fe:c9:7a:70:00) dest 1.1.1.3 (02:00:00:00:00:01)
use of BVI for this purpose is ruled out as this use case
Another good example is vxlan.
Not sure what will happen if multiple graph nodes are fighting for the
same port though.
Ray K
https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/src/vnet/vxlan/vxlan.c
|clib_error_t *vxlan_init (vlib_main_t *vm) { vxlan_main_t * vxm =
_main; vxm->vnet_main = vnet_get_main();
12 matches
Mail list logo