On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:32:26 -0800
Damjan Marion wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> Can you make this dependency optional? CMake detect presence of libuuid and
> then
> conditionally compile vmbus code?
>
> In some cases that library might not be present, specially in some embedded
> cases...
>
> That
rdtsc instruction reads timestamp counter which ticks on the constant nominal
frequency
which means that it will count ticks equally even when CPU is in deep sleep or
when CPU is in turbo burst
mode. That gives very precise time measurement (i.e. on 2.5GHz CPU tick will
always be 0.4ns) but
Hi folks,
I've ran into an issue with hugepages on a Cavium ThunderX soc. I was trying to
bind a physical interface to VPP. When using 1GB hugepages the interface seems
to be working fine (well, at least I saw the interface in VPP and I was able to
configure it and use ping with it), but when
-1 on a completely new set of API function wrappers.
If I wanted to provide a means for backward compatibility, I would add a
NO_TYPE_CONVERSION_DEFAULT (although I like LEGACY_TYPE_CONVERSION_DEFAULT)
default value to the class instead of hardcoding the boolean and the consumer
can create a
Dear Juraj,
I don't think anybody have experience with ThunderX to help you here.
The facts that other NICs work OK indicates that that this particular driver
requires something special.
What it is, you will probably need to ask Cavium/Marvell guys...
--
Damjan
> On 11 Dec 2018, at 07:56,
To me, seems like it is not a real random generator.
We need someone implement it.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Neale Ranns via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 6:11 PM
To: Hu, Xuekun ; Dave Barach (dbarach)
; vpp-dev
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] get
Got it. Thanks!
My CPU is “Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz”. As I can see, the CPU is
kind of running slower when ‘cpu-cycles’ event is enabled, while it is normal
with ‘instructions’ event is enabled.
You can see the difference shown below. Texts in red are vector counts for the
Hi all,
I need the ikev2 could do NAT SOURCE DETECTION && NAT DESTINATION DETECTION
for NAT-T.
Is there anybody be familiar with ikev2 part ? Code this part please!
Thanks!
wangchuan...@163.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online
Greetings, VPP folks.
I am continuing to work on my vpp + router-plugin (+FRRouting) set-up.
I have things mostly working with very large routing tables (source from
multiple BGP peers), but am having some challenges when trying to use
multi-threaded (additional worker threads) for increasing
Hi Xuekun,
The transaction ID used by VPP is from a series of random numbers, however,
each VPP seeds the RNG the same, so the sequence will be the same. Please
update:
static clib_error_t *
dhcp_client_init (vlib_main_t * vm)
{
dhcp_client_main_t *dcm = _client_main;
dcm->vlib_main = vm;
Looking at the that log, I don’t think the failure is related to the issue
discussed here, but it does warrant further investigation. I don’t see it
happen on my machine, but if some-one can get me a log.txt from the test case,
I’ll take a look.
/neale
De : au nom de
Hi,
I was trying to generate Java APIs based on VPP DEB and RPM packages. With
Debian everything works. With RPM packages I have some difficulties. In Debian
packages I am able to distinguish between Core API files and plugin API files
because VPP debian package contains only core api.json and
Hi Dave,
I’m looking at the perfmon plugin. It is a fantastic tool tuning node
performance, extremely helpful. Thanks for the great contribution.
Here I got a question about ‘cpu-cycles’ event. It shows very different results
if comparing with clocks of ‘show run’. Around 20% slower. I checked
Dear All,
I am trying to configure ACL on a particular PPPoE session. I have
successfully established a PPPoE session over interface
VirtualEthernet0/0/0, and I am able to ping VPP from the PPPoE client side
and my packets are being routed correctly. However, when I add ACL (default
drop) to
Hi,
I have noticed that “ip4-reassembly-feature” node only reassembles
packets stored in the local pool of each thread. But it seems not right if a
group of fragment packages is handled by different worker thread. So is there
any tricks in VPP forcing the fragment packages in the
Hi Mikado,
if the fragments get split between multiple workers, then eventually
they'll get dropped after timing out ...
Regards,
Klement
Quoting Mikado (2018-12-11 08:52:28)
>Hi,
>
> I have noticed that “ip4-reassembly-feature” node only
>reassembles packets stored in the
Hi,
In
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16431/
I have added support for ipaddress objects for API calls that use one of the
following types:
vl_api_address_t, vl_api_ip4_address, vl_api_ip6_address_t, vl_api_prefix_t,
vl_api_ip4_prefix_t,
vl_api_ip6_prefix_t
The calls will still support the
The “show run” stats use rdtsc instructions, vs. “show pmc” which uses rdpmc
instructions with a specific counter selected.
Perhaps Damjan or one of our colleagues from Intel can explain the difference.
D.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Kingwel Xie
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018
18 matches
Mail list logo
