On Wednesday 13 October 2004 06:35, David MacKinnon wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I had something similar happen, but then it turned out the problem was
with my config. I figured it out by inserting an occasional echo
statement into
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
ip addr show
could you attach the output here please?
I'll post it tomorrow when I'm back at work. Hard to get the output
remotely when the machine drops off the network :)
As an aside, if I use the legacy vserver support (put in an apropriate
.conf file in
On Fri, 8 October 2004 13:37:30 -0400, Matt Ayres wrote:
The guy who was going to work on it disappeared. I was actually even
willing to fund the time it took to write it :)
Disappeared isn't exactly true, although close. For the rest of this
year my time is quite limited.
As for the
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:36:52PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
Hello list
I have a production system running linux kernel version 2.4.20 with
ctx patch applied. After entering a virtual context I'm unable to
attach to running processes using the strace utility, and I don't
Hi,
here is the strace of the last action of a vserver stop
- reboot - :-)
...
...
Rebooting...
execve(/sbin/reboot, [reboot, -d, -f, -i], [/* 23 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys=Linux, node=distcc, ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x804b000
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
all,
Having just read a post about someone using an older version of the
linux-vserver patches I thought it might be interesting to submit the
following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/stats$ uname -a
Linux xx 2.4.20ctx-17.dlg2 #1 SMP Mon Jun 23 10:03:41 GMT 2003 i686
unknown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/stats$
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:39:53 +1000
David MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ran into this today one some new servers I'm setting up.
util-vserver 0.30.195 (but it happened with 190 as well)
vserver 2.6 patch 1.9.2 on 2.6.8.1 (with dm/drbd and nfs patches)
When I stop _any_ vserver,
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 15:32, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:39:53 +1000
David MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ran into this today one some new servers I'm setting up.
util-vserver 0.30.195 (but it happened with 190 as well)
vserver 2.6 patch 1.9.2 on
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi evreybody,
I 'm trying to work with Vserver 2.6 branch, patch version 1.9.3-rc2 on
a debian kernel 2.6.8-1-686, and an util-vserver package 0.30.195.
After a good compil, a build creation with legacy mode, all seem to work
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:12:57PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
On Fri, 8 October 2004 13:37:30 -0400, Matt Ayres wrote:
The guy who was going to work on it disappeared. I was actually even
willing to fund the time it took to write it :)
Disappeared isn't exactly true, although close. For
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 06:35, David MacKinnon wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I had something similar happen, but then it turned out the problem was
with my config. I figured it out by inserting an
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:00:17PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 15:32, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:39:53 +1000
David MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ran into this today one some new servers I'm setting up.
util-vserver
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:48:16PM +0200, Mark Lawrence wrote:
all,
Having just read a post about someone using an older version of the
linux-vserver patches I thought it might be interesting to submit the
following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/stats$ uname -a
Linux xx 2.4.20ctx-17.dlg2 #1
Jörn Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New-variant cowlinks are closer to symlinks than anything else.
Like symlinks they allocate an extra inode per link. Like fast
symlinks for ext[23] they store the link information in the inode
itself.
Still, don't think of it as a symlink, it's not.
On Wed, 13 October 2004 19:01:04 +0200, Olivier Poitrey wrote:
Jörn Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New-variant cowlinks are closer to symlinks than anything else.
Like symlinks they allocate an extra inode per link. Like fast
symlinks for ext[23] they store the link information in the
What immediately strikes me about the idea of COW links is that for most
uses of it, a union mount/transparent/overlay filesystem simply works
better. Here's what I mean:
1) accounting: you can easily and transparently tell exactly how many
files are changed from the original by looking on your
On Wed, 13 October 2004 11:19:31 -0700, Liam Helmer wrote:
What immediately strikes me about the idea of COW links is that for most
uses of it, a union mount/transparent/overlay filesystem simply works
better. Here's what I mean:
s/most/some/. A few people argued along the same lines before
Hey Jörn!
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:22:37PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
I don't completely understand all your questions. If I fail to
properly answer them, please be a bastard and keep asking.
you asked for it! ;)
On Wed, 13 October 2004 16:29:05 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Oct
18 matches
Mail list logo
