On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 07:19:50PM +0100, Oliver Welter wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> question on syslog
>
> What is the best way to use syslog inside the vServers - is it possible
> to have one Logfile on the main maschine that collects all information ?
yes, definitely
> Whats the best way to
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 08:08:34PM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
>
> [ Vserver guest systems are different from normal systems, and thus
> require special handling s
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:28:44PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi all, Merry XMas -
> >>
> >>Is there a simpler way to track IPC resourc
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Hi all, Merry XMas -
Is there a simpler way to track IPC resources short of entering every
context and running ipcs? It seems that context 1 can only see its own
semaphores/locks
I think that an attacker is going to know it's a vserver anyways if
they're looking. So, I have all the vservers logs being pulled by a
central logging daemon, which logs it all to mysql. It's more convenient
and useful, IMHO. I think that having too many separate logging daemons
logging to differe
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
[ Vserver guest systems are different from normal systems, and thus
require special handling services for klogd and hardware access.
Herbert Poetzl says "just disable the servi
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 07:19:50PM +0100, Oliver Welter wrote:
> What is the best way to use syslog inside the vServers - is it possible
> to have one Logfile on the main maschine that collects all information ?
> Whats the best way to do so ? Sharing a syslock socket ? Creating a
> syslog insta
Den 28. dec 2004, kl. 19:19, skrev Oliver Welter:
Hi Folks,
question on syslog
What is the best way to use syslog inside the vServers - is it
possible to have one Logfile on the main maschine that collects all
information ? Whats the best way to do so ? Sharing a syslock socket ?
Creating a
Hi Folks,
question on syslog
What is the best way to use syslog inside the vServers - is it possible
to have one Logfile on the main maschine that collects all information ?
Whats the best way to do so ? Sharing a syslock socket ? Creating a
syslog instance fpr each vServer and using network
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:43:45PM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an excerpt from util-vserver-0.30.196/doc/cfg.txt:
>
> /etc/vservers
> |--
> `-- interfaces
> |-- [dev]
> |-- [prefix]
> |-- [mask]
> |-- [bcast]
> `-- *
>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
>
> Hi all, Merry XMas -
>
> Is there a simpler way to track IPC resources short of entering every
> context and running ipcs? It seems that context 1 can only see its own
> semaphores/locks/etc, wouldn't it make mo
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 09:05:21PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> * Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:48:43PM -0500, Stephen Frost
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
>
> >> [... absolute paths vs. resolution with $PATH ...]
> >> using execvp(3) would mean:
> >> * trusting in $PATH that it contains the wanted path (this has to deal
> >> with packaging p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
>> [... absolute paths vs. resolution with $PATH ...]
>> using execvp(3) would mean:
>> * trusting in $PATH that it contains the wanted path (this has to deal
>> with packaging philosophies also which expect all 3rd party apps
>> under /opt/) --> /etc
* Hans Ulrich Niedermann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> And you can even do that disabling cleanly and automatically if you
> install your guest systems with a virtual klogd instead of the
> standard one which contains nothing but
>
> Provides: linux-kernel-log-daemon
> Conflicts: li
* Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 09:05:21PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Again, a Debian util-vserver package couldn't do that due to sane policy
> > issues. It'd be nice if we didn't have to worry about it because the
> > kernel/vserver patch took care of i
* Enrico Scholz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
> > So, it's used by scripts *and* is compiled into programs?
>
> Yes; e.g.
I believed you, I just find it kind of ugly. :)
> > I'm thinking it might go in /usr/share/util-vserver then, since it's
> > not syst
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Enrico Scholz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * execve(2) is more efficiently than execvp(3)
>
> Is there something in here that actually would notice from such a
> change? Seriously, is there *really* some benefit here for an end user
> or is this ju
Hi,
this is an excerpt from util-vserver-0.30.196/doc/cfg.txt:
/etc/vservers
|--
`-- interfaces
|-- [dev]
|-- [prefix]
|-- [mask]
|-- [bcast]
`-- *
|-- ip
|-- [dev]
|-- [prefix]
|-- [mask]
|--
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 09:05:21PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:48:43PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > > syslogd and klogd are seperate packages already, the problem is tha
20 matches
Mail list logo
