[Vserver] RE: [Devel] Container Test Campaign

2006-07-03 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hi Kirill, Thanks for the feedback. Not sure whether you are referring to Clement's work or our paper. I'll assume you are referring to our paper. From what I see just just after 1 minute check of your results: DBench: - different disk I/O schedulers are compared. This makes

[Vserver] report comparing vserver w/ xen

2006-05-02 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hello, The following URL is for a paper that we wrote on Container-based Operating System Virtualization: A Scalable, High-performance alternative to Hypervisors. At the performance, scale, and isolation level it compares vserver with xen. We chose vserver simply because we use it on 600+

RE: [Vserver] vdlimit

2004-09-21 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
-Original Message- From: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:07 AM To: Marc E. Fiuczynski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vserver] vdlimit On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:09:03PM -0400, Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Hi, Was trying to get vdlimit to work

RE: [Vserver] vdlimit

2004-09-21 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:20 AM To: Marc E. Fiuczynski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vserver] vdlimit On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:24:22AM -0400, Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: It works flawlessly, of course. My mistake was to give it a dev

RE: [Vserver] vdlimit

2004-09-21 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
I am using Fedora Core 2. -Original Message- From: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:38 AM To: Marc E. Fiuczynski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vserver] vdlimit On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 08:36:50AM -0400, Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Here

RE: [Vserver] Reiser4 views/process oriented security proposal

2004-09-17 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hi Sandino, In what compelling VPS scenarios is the VPS administrator != host system administrator? Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sandino Araico Sánchez Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Vserver] Reiser4 views/process oriented security proposal

2004-09-17 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
so dense. Cheers, Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sandino Araico Sánchez Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 5:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vserver] Reiser4 views/process oriented security proposal Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote

RE: [Vserver] Re: BSDJAILS in 2.6.x as LSM?

2004-09-13 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Herbert, I've already contacted the author, some time ago, and again yesterday, maybe we can work together on that ... we'll see ... What would you expect to happen via this collaboration with the BSDJAIL project? I.e., would vserver move to an LSM implementation? yes, it seems to be the IBM

RE: [Vserver] Re: BSDJAILS in 2.6.x as LSM?

2004-09-13 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hi Herbert, Re. the perspectives you mentioned: I am definitely in the kernel integrator camp wrt vserver, so clearly my perspective is biased. I have no idea what you mean by it's fine if the user has problems with the mainline version, it's not ours... comment. Based on my reading of perf.

RE: [Vserver] Context disk limits.

2004-08-25 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Looks like the attachments didn't make it through. Folks interested in this can just send me email and I'll make them available via some other channel. Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc E. Fiuczynski Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004

[Vserver] RE: [ckrm-tech] CKRM with VServers

2004-07-28 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Pardon for the resend of this crosspost, but I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Marc E. Fiuczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:29 PM To: Shailabh Nagar; Sam Vilain; ckrm-tech; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

[Vserver] test -- please ignore

2004-07-22 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Haven't received anything on this list in a while. Testing for activity. ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

[Vserver] vserver ckrm integration

2004-07-22 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
-- please ignore. Any way, this message is simply to validate that the vserver mailing list works. Best regards, Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:47 AM To: marc e. fiuczynski Subject: Autoreply: [Vserver] test -- please

RE: [Vserver] vserver ckrm integration

2004-07-22 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hi Liam, I've tried to add myself to the vserver mailing lists again. But I have not received any email from the list management program (or the list admin). In responding to this email or the thread, please cc it to me as well. As far as I can tell, integration would be easy enough to do if

[Vserver] [ckrm-tech] rule based classification

2004-07-08 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Could someone give me an overview of how the rbce works? Specifically, I am interested in modifying the rbce kernel support to be vserver context ID aware. The main problem that I need to solve is that uid/gid's are not unique across vserver contexts. E.g., UID 501 in context 2 and UID 501 in

[Vserver] RE: [ckrm-tech] rule based classification

2004-07-08 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
). This is pretty straight forward. If you give me the field I can see whether I can help you out with this. Hope this helps.. -- Hubertus Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Could someone give me an overview of how the rbce works? Specifically, I am interested in modifying the rbce kernel support