Herbert, >I've already contacted the author, some time ago, >and again yesterday, maybe we can work together >on that ... we'll see ...
What would you expect to happen via this collaboration with the BSDJAIL project? I.e., would vserver move to an LSM implementation? >yes, it seems to be the IBM approach to vservers >(based on LSM but maybe? on it's way into mainline) It would be good if vserver was based on LSM, too, rather than its current approach. However, as you mentioned in a previous discussion, there are additional things that vserver does/requires that are not part of LSM. What are these and which one of those can be assumed by CKRM? Marc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Herbert Poetzl Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:21 AM To: Christian Mayrhuber Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Vserver] Re: BSDJAILS in 2.6.x as LSM? On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 05:11:09PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > What is this? > > I guess it's incompatible with linux vserver: > http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3823?PHPSESSID=547dfb4ca1fb6e90bc185bba02229 ea5 thanks, Herbert > -- > lg, Chris _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
