Hi there,
on Friday, May 5, 2006 at 5:58:56 AM there was posted:
BS AFAIK the build methods of util-vserver build FC vservers with a minimum
BS of installed packages. less, rpm and man are not bash commands but
BS separate programs which are probably simply not installed yet.
This is fully
Hi,
I'm new to vservers. I installed the vserver from rpms and built it
according to the instructions on Vserver Installation Fedora Core 4. I
was under the impression that a vserver has all the same files in its
/etc directory as the host machine, but my vserver has fewer files.
On 2006.05.04 22:46:07 -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to vservers. I installed the vserver from rpms and built it
according to the instructions on Vserver Installation Fedora Core 4. I
was under the impression that a vserver has all the same files in its
/etc directory as the
Hi all
I installed the kernel patches and utils successfully on my dual
xeon-ia32 fc4-x86_64 box now running
2.6.13-1.1532_FC4.vs2.0.1.0.pre2.1smp (after recompiling the SRPMS for
this arch). I use util-vserver 0.30.209-5.
Then, I adapted /etc/vservers/.distributions/fc4/apt/sources.list to
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Marcel Gsteiger wrote:
Hi all
I installed the kernel patches and utils successfully on my dual
xeon-ia32 fc4-x86_64 box now running
xeon-ia32 with x86_64 ? well, folks @ intel must
be drinking ...
2.6.13-1.1532_FC4.vs2.0.1.0.pre2.1smp (after
I have no clue what this means anyone?
First you need to find vprocunhide script end execute it once per server
reboot.
second you do not need to create /vserver/NAME dir
cause creation script will do it for you.
Cheers,
Matvey
___
Vserver
Matvey Gladkikh wrote:
I have no clue what this means anyone?
First you need to find vprocunhide script end execute it once per server
reboot.
second you do not need to create /vserver/NAME dir
cause creation script will do it for you.
It sounds really easy when you say it like this
[eMAXX] Sys-Admin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
The main concern I have, is to keep Vserver updated when it's running.
Debian got a great packiging system, but how should I upgrade Vserver
(that was build from scratch) when a new version is released? Build
again from scratch? That's why I
On 14/09/05 10:39 +0200, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
I saw Debian unstable adopted util-vserver-0.30.208
(http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/util-vserver), but I'm want to
use the stable branch. Should I mix?
no, I think you should backport 2.6.12 kernel from sid for using it on sarge
On 14/09/05 11:36 +0200, Daniel Kraft wrote:
To much decisions to make ...what's wise to do?
I'll have to meditate about this...
I will write down this :-)
Cheers,
Matvey
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Matvey Gladkikh wrote:
On 14/09/05 10:39 +0200, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
I saw Debian unstable adopted util-vserver-0.30.208
(http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/util-vserver), but I'm want to
use the stable branch. Should I mix?
no, I think you should backport 2.6.12 kernel
Ok ... let's start that install again :) Whenever I get it to work,
you'll notice it by my questions about the configuration ;)
Have you found vprocunhide script on your server?
apt-get install slocate
locate -u /
locate vprocunhide
/path/to/vprocunhide start
vserver-stat should work after
Matvey Gladkikh wrote:
other packeges I compile myself with the help of checkinstall for stable
distro. guest vservers should be updated by apt-get.
get 2.6.12 kernel-sources from sid
get patch vserver 2.6.12
cd /usr/src/2.6.12sources/
patch -p1 ./patch*
make oldconfig
make menuconfig (to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
| I search the irc-log and then tried this:
|~# /usr/lib/util-vserver/vprocunhide/proc/net/: Bad address
|/proc/sys/: Bad address
|/proc/sys/debug/: Bad address
|/proc/sys/dev/: Bad address
|
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
Sounds like fix01 was used rather than fix02.
I wouldn't know, since I used precompiled debianpackages:
http://linux-vserver.derjohn.de/
But util-vserver (0.30.208-1) in
http://linux-vserver.derjohn.de/util-vserver_0.30.208-1_i386.changes
suggest fix01
[eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
Anyway, I found out that these packages are the best way to get my
vserver running :)
That shoud be:Are NOT the best way
Vince.
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
On 14/09/05 13:26 +0200, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
You're going to fast for me; as far as I can see, sid does not provide
the 2.6.12 kernel-sources: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages
Would this be ok as well:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.12.4.tar.bz2 ?
Matvey Gladkikh wrote:
On 14/09/05 13:26 +0200, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
You're going to fast for me; as far as I can see, sid does not provide
the 2.6.12 kernel-sources: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages
Okey guess I made a mistake here, since there ARE kernel-source
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 22:32, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
Hi folks,
Ok, I'm totally lost. I don't seem to get a vserver install to work...
well at least not the latest version..
I am also a newbie, and I have done it with Debian recently, so let's see
what's different.
I'm trying to
Sorry if these are FAQ's:
Are there any problems with SMP and vserver (1.24)? We're thinking of
ordering a dual cpu xeon machine, but I wanted to check first to make sure
that there are no known problems.
Also - how stable/unstable is the 1.3.x release - is it better to try 1.3
if starting from
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:28:54PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Sorry if these are FAQ's:
Are there any problems with SMP and vserver (1.24)? We're thinking of
ordering a dual cpu xeon machine, but I wanted to check first to make sure
that there are no known problems.
vs1.23
21 matches
Mail list logo
