On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Guenther Fuchs wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> on Monday, April 24, 2006 at 3:57:43 PM there was posted:
>
> >> e> - way of keeping heavily-commented template config for vserver.
> >> e> There is no easy way to comment current config.
> >> Agreed.
>
> HP> what
Hi there,
on Monday, April 24, 2006 at 3:57:43 PM there was posted:
>> e> - way of keeping heavily-commented template config for vserver.
>> e> There is no easy way to comment current config.
>> Agreed.
HP> what about writing option.info files?
The documentation lacks this optional info yet ;
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Guenther Fuchs wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> on Sunday, April 23, 2006 at 9:57:06 AM there was posted:
>
> e> - ability to hot-add/hot-remove IPs from running guest
> This is lost? AFAIK it is still possible, using the proper context.
this is a feature which w
Guenther Fuchs wrote:
e> - way of keeping heavily-commented template config for vserver. There is
e>no easy way to comment current config.
Agreed.
I right now writing a smal script that collects the config in one file,
for transfer over http to a monitoring webapp. I probably later will
On 23 Apr 2006 at 12:29, Dominique Chabord wrote:
> hello everybody
>
> Thank you for the excellent job you're all doing with vservers !
>
> Le 23 avr. 06, à 11:44, Oliver Welter a écrit :
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >> I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one
> >> file per v
Sorry if you think this is off-topic.
Le 23 avr. 06, à 12:44, Oliver Welter a écrit :
hi Dominique
Hi
I'm dealing with failover intensively too. In any case of failover
(automated or manual) I have to check that configuration is exactly
replicated and up-to-date on all nodes (usually four
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver
Welter
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 11:44 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] great flower page
Hi Folks,
> I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with o
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver
Welter
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 11:44 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] great flower page
Hi Folks,
> I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to c
Le 23 avr. 06, à 12:37, GarconDuMonde a écrit :
Dominique Chabord wrote:
And sorry to be so stupid : how do you adapt the GFP css ? So far I
have
to use lynx to read it ;-)
i use mozilla firefox [1]. you go to 'view' then 'page style' and
select one
that you like.
Wonderful, I never tried
hi Dominique
I'm dealing with failover intensively too. In any case of failover
(automated or manual) I have to check that configuration is exactly
replicated and up-to-date on all nodes (usually four or five nodes),
else I disable failover. So I used to check versionning information
hard-cod
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:57:06 +0200
"eyck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In spite of stiff opposition, and with loosing a lot of important
> > > functionality in the process...
> > hmm, what kind of functionality was lost, IYO?
>
> - ability to hot-mount directories into running guest
vname
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
Dominique Chabord wrote:
> And sorry to be so stupid : how do you adapt the GFP css ? So far I have
> to use lynx to read it ;-)
i use mozilla firefox [1]. you go to 'view' then 'page style' and select one
that you like.
[1] http://www.mozilla.c
hello everybody
Thank you for the excellent job you're all doing with vservers !
Le 23 avr. 06, à 11:44, Oliver Welter a écrit :
Hi Folks,
I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one
file per vserver like in freevps
Moreover most of Linux program use only one file
Hi Folks,
I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one
file per vserver like in freevps
Moreover most of Linux program use only one file to config ...
I don't see where is easier to maintain it ? ...
It's much easier to deploy and modfiy the configuration on this basi
eyck a écrit :
b) this was done about two or three? years ago ...
In spite of stiff opposition, and with loosing a lot of important
functionality in the process...
I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one
file per vserver like in freevps
Moreover
Hi there,
on Sunday, April 23, 2006 at 9:57:06 AM there was posted:
e> - ability to hot-add/hot-remove IPs from running guest
This is lost? AFAIK it is still possible, using the proper context.
e> - ability to enter running/non-running guest
Running guest entering is not lost, non-running gues
> > In spite of stiff opposition, and with loosing a lot of important
> > functionality in the process...
> hmm, what kind of functionality was lost, IYO?
- ability to hot-add/hot-remove IPs from running guest
- ability to enter running/non-running guest
- ability to hot-mount directories int
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:08:50AM +0200, eyck wrote:
> > b) this was done about two or three? years ago ...
> In spite of stiff opposition, and with loosing a lot of important
> functionality in the process...
hmm, what kind of functionality was lost, IYO?
best,
Herbert
> --
> Key finge
> b) this was done about two or three? years ago ...
In spite of stiff opposition, and with loosing a lot of important
functionality in the process...
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Total Existance Failure
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:54:50AM +0200, ehab heikal wrote:
> The colors and background images in the great flower page make the
> readability of this page terrible.
which stylesheet did you use?
> Also I used the old vserver and the old configuration file was much
> simpler to manage, why was t
Title: Message
The
colors and background images in the great flower page make the readability of
this page terrible.
Also I
used the old vserver and the old configuration file was much simpler to manage,
why was this change done?
___
Vserver mail
21 matches
Mail list logo
