On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:02:04AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 17:37, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > > On Friday 01 April 2005 13:51, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Did enyone get NGnet ru
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:25:41PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
>
> I would also keep measurements of CPU ticks used. Since IO requires CPU
> cycles - is it possible that a CPU sched_hard indirectly limits IO just as
> well?
my suggestion (and actually plans for I/O issues) are
On Friday 01 April 2005 17:37, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > On Friday 01 April 2005 13:51, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Did enyone get NGnet running on vserver 1.9.5?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> >
> > http://distfiles.g
The CPU ticks are in /proc/virtual//sched
Grisha
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
I would also keep measurements of CPU ticks used. Since IO requires CPU
cycles - is it possible that a CPU sched_hard indirectly limits IO just as
well?
Grisha
How do you do that?
P.S. I'm still compiling the
> I would also keep measurements of CPU ticks used. Since IO requires CPU
> cycles - is it possible that a CPU sched_hard indirectly limits IO just as
> well?
>
> Grisha
How do you do that?
P.S. I'm still compiling the vanilla kernel (I haven't even applied the
vserver patch yet). At this ra
I would also keep measurements of CPU ticks used. Since IO requires CPU
cycles - is it possible that a CPU sched_hard indirectly limits IO just as
well?
Grisha
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
I think I can create a test cas
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:36:29PM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
>
> I have been reading through the list archives about NFS and am trying
> to get the userspace server unfs3 working, but when I start it, the
> server errors with:
>
> unable to register (NFS3_PROGRAM, NFS_V3, udp)
>
> or, if I force
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:31:07PM +0200, Oliver Welter wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> >>>hmm - so I think I have to mod the sources as I cant find appropriate
> >>>kernel config params...
> >
> >check for security modules and capabilities in particular
> >
> Can you tell me what I must look for ?
> If
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:23:00PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > > I think I can create a test case for this. I have a server that is not
> > > currently running any vserver stuff that will be ok with a reboot now
> > and
> > > th
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > I think I can create a test case for this. I have a server that is not
> > currently running any vserver stuff that will be ok with a reboot now
> and
> > then.
>
> sounds good, please try to get 1.9.5.5 working there,
> because
Hi Herbert,
hmm - so I think I have to mod the sources as I cant find appropriate
kernel config params...
check for security modules and capabilities in particular
Can you tell me what I must look for ?
If you mean "kernel" modules - i have a monolithic one - so no modules
are loaded at all
S
I have been reading through the list archives about NFS and am trying
to get the userspace server unfs3 working, but when I start it, the
server errors with:
unable to register (NFS3_PROGRAM, NFS_V3, udp)
or, if I force tcp only operation:
unable to register (NFS3_PROGRAM, NFS_V3, tcp)
Did I m
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:06:19PM +0400, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
>
> > > does ntpd start on this kernel in xid=0, that is, _not_ in virtual
> > > context?
> >
> > yes the ntp is running in the "main" context
> >
> > > I'm not sure, but If it doesn't, see "capabilities" module or like that
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 13:51, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Did enyone get NGnet running on vserver 1.9.5?
> >
> > Best regards,
>
> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/vspatches-1.9.5-00.tar.bz2 contains
> ngnet 9.4 a
> > does ntpd start on this kernel in xid=0, that is, _not_ in virtual
> > context?
>
> yes the ntp is running in the "main" context
>
> > I'm not sure, but If it doesn't, see "capabilities" module or like that --
> > "realtime" etc, depends on the kernel configuration.
>
> hmm - so I think
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> hmm, looks the the x25 issues strikes again ...
>
> if you do not have a strong reason for compiling x25
> into the kernel, I would advise to remove it ...
> (I already fixed one x25 issue, but obviously the
> code is more broken, will look into it soon)
>> I encountered a problem when I wnated to start a NTP on a vserver-base
>> system
>>
>> i get
>> cap_set_proc() failed to drop root privileges: Operation not permitted
>>
>> The system is Suse 9.2 with a vserver 2.6.9 kernel
>
>
> does ntpd start on this kernel in xid=0, that is, _not_ in virtual
В сообщении от Пятница 01 Апрель 2005 17:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(a):
> Hi All,
>
> I encountered a problem when I wnated to start a NTP on a vserver-base system
>
> i get
> cap_set_proc() failed to drop root privileges: Operation not permitted
>
> The system is Suse 9.2 with a vserver 2.6.9
Hi All,
I encountered a problem when I wnated to start a NTP on a vserver-base system
i get
cap_set_proc() failed to drop root privileges: Operation not permitted
The system is Suse 9.2 with a vserver 2.6.9 kernel
Any hints
Oliver
___
Vserver mailin
Heyaz,
After half an hour of scripting I came up with a somewhat working
conversion script for Linux-VServer configs to the new directory
configuration layout.
It has been created for my specific environment, but I hope it helps
someone ;)
vscfg-convert.sh
Description: application/shellscript
On Friday 01 April 2005 13:51, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did enyone get NGnet running on vserver 1.9.5?
>
> Best regards,
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/vspatches-1.9.5-00.tar.bz2 contains
ngnet 9.4 against 1.9.5
>
> Bert.
> ___
> Vserve
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:34:04AM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 2005.03.31 17:56:22 +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Gilles wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > test01:/# ifconfig
> > > > > > Segmentation fault
> > > > > >
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > >
> > > I do think that this would be an interesting feature.
> >
> > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/
> > (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff)
> > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter
Hello,
Did enyone get NGnet running on vserver 1.9.5?
Best regards,
Bert.
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 00:54, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> - request new features, reject/block weird stuff
> - propose new ideas, complain about broken things
> - test and last but not least _use_ the 'product'
> - help out with your time, resources or money
Hello Herbert,
Here are some perso
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2005.03.31 17:56:22 +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Gilles wrote:
> >
> > > > > test01:/# ifconfig
> > > > > Segmentation fault
> > > > > test01:/# ifconfig -a
> > > > > Segmentation fault
> > > >
> ifconfig is old and
26 matches
Mail list logo