Hi Guys,
this is mainly for hollow et al - what is the latest ebuild you will
consider good for production of the 2.1 series ?
I am currently running 2.6.15.4-vs2.1.1-rc6-gentoo and want to upgrade
due to the latest kernel bugs
Oliver
--
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
On Thursday, 07. September. 2006 12:35, Oliver Welter wrote:
Hi Guys,
this is mainly for hollow et al - what is the latest ebuild you will
consider good for production of the 2.1 series ?
I am currently running 2.6.15.4-vs2.1.1-rc6-gentoo and want to upgrade
due to the latest kernel
Due to the speed the _rc's occured, we thought that moving those ebuilds to
our project overlay [1] would make sense. The overlay is subversion based,
but you should be able to grab it via wget (or similar) if you can't/wont
install subversion just for this single repo.
TIA, Christian
[1]
Hi Christian,
question as missleading - I know the overlay but I wonder if there is
some categorization about quite stable / bleeding edge in the rcs or
if it is ok to take always the latest one.
Oliver
--
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
oliwel's public key:
On Thu September 7 2006 06:52, Marcus wrote:
Due to the speed the _rc's occured, we thought that moving those ebuilds to
our project overlay [1] would make sense. The overlay is subversion based,
but you should be able to grab it via wget (or similar) if you can't/wont
install
I am getting ready do set up a new vserver host using Opterons.. however some
of the guests will be pre-compiled 32bit such as CentOS.. if the host Gentoo
is AMD64 will this cause problems? Should I just do x86 i686 all the way
around and use CFLAGS to optimize for Opteron?
It must be
On Thursday 07 September 2006 21:52, Chuck wrote:
I am getting ready do set up a new vserver host using Opterons.. however
some of the guests will be pre-compiled 32bit such as CentOS.. if the host
Gentoo is AMD64 will this cause problems? Should I just do x86 i686 all the
way around and use
Admin wrote:
You don't have to run a 64bit userland for the host. For the most
platform-compatible setup you can compile 32 and 64bit kernels (crossdev on
gentoo makes this very easy) and choose which to run at boot This allows you
to bring the host and 32bit vservers up on on a 32bit platform
Hi Christian
Nope there is no categorization or rating in the svn-repo. I also wouldn't
use
the _rc's on a stable machine, since from time to time there's some bugs in
them that need to be fixed.
So - what do you suggest for using 2.1 on gentoo?
I run the 2.1 for over a year now without
Title: Message
I am trying to build
an fc3 test system in and fc4 x86 when i install with vserver build and the
option of distro is fc3 everything is ok until I try to internalize the package
management , when doing this the package management inside the guest does not
work also the
ehab heikal wrote:
I am trying to build an fc3 test system in and fc4 x86 when i install
with vserver build and the option of distro is fc3 everything is ok
until I try to internalize the package management , when doing this the
package management inside the guest does not work also the
rm -f /var/lib/__db*; rpm --rebuilddb did not do the trick.
Does anyone know of a good way to build a fc3 guest in an fc4 host?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Hokka Zakrisson
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:25 PM
To:
Corey Wright wrote:
i was curious if vhashify cleaned up after itself (delete orphaned
instances of files in hash directory), and it appears it doesn't. these
commands should do the job. well, technically this just lists files with a
hardlink count of 1 and prints the total size in bytes of all
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Corey Wright wrote:
i was curious if vhashify cleaned up after itself (delete orphaned
instances of files in hash directory), and it appears it doesn't. these
commands should do the job. well, technically this just lists files
with a
hardlink count of 1 and prints
On Thursday, 07. September. 2006 18:41, you wrote:
Hi Christian
Nope there is no categorization or rating in the svn-repo. I also
wouldn't use the _rc's on a stable machine, since from time to time
there's some bugs in them that need to be fixed.
So - what do you suggest for using 2.1 on
15 matches
Mail list logo
