again.
On my development machine i use ipv6 and i don't want to disable it. However,
the vservers there are only for my personal use.
For production i never would recommend to mix ipv6 + vserver, as long as the
ipv6 implementation hasn't been done by somebody.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin
.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot se
--
Delta: We're Amtrak with wings. -- David Letterman
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 12:54, ajit malik wrote:
Hello!
Please remove me from your list.
Thanks,
Malik
You could have done that at http://list.linux-vserver.org yourself, but
i've done for you.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot se
--
A sad spectacle
at http://www.ispworks.org . Have a look. It might be
useful.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot se
--
If you always postpone pleasure you will never have it. Quit work and
play for once!
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
As some unfortunatly have noticed (why is it, that something allways gets
forgotten) the list-server has, do to a hardware demand, moved ip this night.
Things should be normal again. If not, drop me a mail and i'll look into it.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot net
Hi,
i've been upgrading the software for the mailinglist server this night.
If there are any problems, please mail me directly.
Upgrade went without interuptions.
/Martin
--
Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities.
-- Mark Twain
I upgraded the list software 2 days ago, the next step is some
additional ressources on fighting spam.
It's really extreme, how the amount of spam is increasing.
/Martin
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 21:52, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
Damn...i cant believe it.
We just got a mail from a web directory
will be discarded automatically.
- Mails where the mailinglist name not is in either To: or Cc: will
allways be discarded.
I haven't yet got any feedback if that would be acceptible or not
Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin (at) list (dash) petersen (dot) net
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 13:59, Jon
Hmm .. my mailclient just missed a line there --
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 20:12, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 21:38, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
I run several lists using mailman. I'd hate to sub/unsub all those
folks by hand.
In Mailman 2.1 it is not that bad anymore
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 22:38, Lucas Albers wrote:
Martin List-Petersen said:
I've discussed this issue with Herbert and others before.
Allready now we have spamassassin, denial of html mails, denial of
posts, that don't have the mailinglist in To: or Cc:, virusscan and
various other
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:10, Petar [Lists] wrote:
We all have a pretty good idea that the spam will increase and without
some form of moderation i.e. subscription, the list resource will
eventually become useless in that capacity.
My preference is not important. The overall aim is to have a
Subscribed. Please note that it actually says on the linux-vserver list, that
you should contact vserver at tuxbox dot nu currently for subscribing and
unsubscribing.
/Martin
Citat Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everybody,
when currently entering through the mailman webfrontend and
done
/Martin
Citat Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:22:19PM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:31:59 -0600
Geraldine Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%MAKE_TXT[3-6]
done.
/Martin
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 14:57, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:42:48AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
On Friday 09 July 2004 11:35, alvaro wrote:
Either make this list FINALLY subscribed ONLY or remove me. I can't read this
spam any longer!
, that should take the last 5%.
But until then people will have to live with the occassional spam post.
Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Citat Lucas Albers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Robert Cope said:
Jon Bendtsen wrote:
have you considered using greylisting?
Greylisting really does work well. I implemented it on my antispam smtp
servers and its effect was amazing.
Enable surbl in spamassassin.
My (Vserver) external
On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 12:06, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
Den 11. jul 2004, kl. 1:18, skrev Martin List-Petersen:
I won't touch SpamCop (and surbl uses SpamCop). They list too many
sites, that
aren't spam. Even my server was listed there for about 2 days, because
somebody
has reported a spam
I can only disable people from the list, once people notify me.
I can't prevent people from enabling crappy, non-std. autoresponders
on their accounts, that don't reply to the Return-Path:
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but instead on the From: header,
which they shouldn't.
What actually happened today is,
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 10:51, Warren Togami wrote:
Martin List-Petersen wrote:
I've enabled the whitelist on the mailinglist today. Initially everybody has to
authorise themselfes
(on the first mail), just for my laziness :o)
This should get rid of the rest spam, that from time
Hi,
there have been a couple of updates on the mailinglist-server.
If there is anything not working, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman
Due to some problems friday, the listserver has queued all messages up,
instead of sending them out.
That problem is now fixed. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
Linux-Vserver listmaster
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
test
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
is not used on the server.
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Listmaster
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
with suggestions, etc., but due to a very tight
schedule (and lack of time) these images will be maintained mostly as
they fit for my usage.
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Dublin, Eire
(contact info on -- http://www.marlow.dk/)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
now use the fou4s commandline
tool (http://fou4s.gaugusch.at/). Works perfectly and checks the whole
ugly dependencaes thing.
I have included apt in Fedora, Redhat and SuSE, works like a charm and
has decent updated repositories. So no need for fou4s.
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Dublin
costs today.
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Dublin, Eire
(contact info on -- http://www.marlow.dk/)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux
of the host, not the vserver.
Can anybody confirm this ?
This is so far been seen with 2.4.29-vs1.2.10
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Dublin, Eire
(contact info on -- http://www.marlow.dk/)
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 21:58 +0100, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I have recently been doing some vserver related kernel development
but have had no luck CC my patches to the vserver list. This
last round because I CC to many interested parties.
Is the vserver list
28 matches
Mail list logo
